Search for packages
| purl | pkg:deb/debian/openssl@3.6.2-1?distro=trixie |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Fixed by |
|---|---|---|
| This package is not known to be affected by vulnerabilities. | ||
| Vulnerability | Summary | Aliases |
|---|---|---|
| VCID-115f-qpjk-6kfd | security update |
CVE-2014-3513
|
| VCID-12vf-wkvg-2ffu | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2012-0027
|
| VCID-1f5g-bpbd-xubm | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-3196
|
| VCID-1gad-dyak-abfx | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-3197
|
| VCID-1ggt-ugh5-jqeu | NULL Pointer Dereference An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data. |
CVE-2023-0216
GHSA-29xx-hcv2-c4cp |
| VCID-1h7r-pqtc-vba5 | openssl mitm downgrade attack |
CVE-2005-2969
|
| VCID-1mkj-94qc-zqgn | Buffer Overflow In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()`. Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the `out` parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the `outlen` parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the `out` parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when `EVP_PKEY_decrypt()` is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. |
CVE-2021-3711
GHSA-5ww6-px42-wc85 |
| VCID-1nte-akcn-8ybs | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0289
|
| VCID-1r26-gkt6-f7ad | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2009-4355
|
| VCID-1r3e-8nb4-nyaa | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0290
|
| VCID-2by2-tzdd-kkc7 | Out-of-bounds Write Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used. This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. |
CVE-2023-6129
|
| VCID-31yy-u4q7-xbge | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2014-3470
|
| VCID-33f9-ps96-9bfz | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2106
|
| VCID-373v-jjjp-vuda | several |
CVE-2013-6450
|
| VCID-38zm-z6ta-9bcm | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2176
|
| VCID-3akn-7jds-3kec | security update |
CVE-2014-3567
|
| VCID-3dej-wqvv-muhe | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could result in denial of service. |
CVE-2022-3358
GHSA-4f63-89w9-3jjv |
| VCID-3dr5-bwrd-zbbu | Two vulnerabilities might allow for a Denial of Service of daemons using OpenSSL. |
CVE-2008-1672
|
| VCID-3n1b-pjn6-n7gw | security update |
CVE-2014-3509
|
| VCID-3s4f-e116-j7d7 | A vulnerability in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2018-0732
|
| VCID-3u2b-yumu-rkcd | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via NULL pointer dereference in QUIC protocol handling |
CVE-2025-15468
|
| VCID-42ry-u8du-7qhs | CAN-2003-0543/0544 OpenSSL ASN.1 protocol crashes |
CVE-2003-0544
|
| VCID-45qa-rf1u-kbd8 | openssl: incorrect error checking during CMS verification |
CVE-2009-0591
|
| VCID-491w-a5n6-7ufp | openssl: Insecure path defaults vulnerability in mingw builds |
CVE-2019-1552
|
| VCID-4av4-uykn-17gv | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2011-4109
|
| VCID-4mqa-bkha-kbaj | security update |
CVE-2012-4929
|
| VCID-4qqa-zm88-w7ca | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which might allow attackers to access sensitive information. |
CVE-2017-3731
|
| VCID-4scw-reyj-tyd9 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0287
|
| VCID-4whv-m6bm-v7a9 | A buffer underflow vulnerability and an information disclosure vulnerability have been discovered in OpenSSL. |
CVE-2007-3108
|
| VCID-55px-48g1-jkd4 | openssl: CMS Null dereference vulnerability |
CVE-2016-7053
|
| VCID-5791-w983-4bhn | openssl: Out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling |
CVE-2025-9232
|
| VCID-5aj1-pcam-pbgr | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-3193
|
| VCID-5bn8-6xa9-fqe4 | Improper Certificate Validation Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. |
CVE-2023-0465
|
| VCID-5bpy-8k6q-5uh9 | security update |
CVE-2016-2181
|
| VCID-5q23-97z3-ybhz | Multiple Information Disclosure vulnerabilities in OpenSSL allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2019-1559
|
| VCID-5r72-j9mb-rfa4 | openssl: Corrupting larger payloads when using ChaCha20/Poly1305 ciphersuites leads to DoS |
CVE-2016-7054
|
| VCID-5t48-q1g9-53be | security update |
CVE-2019-1543
|
| VCID-5uzu-3dbu-yfcr | security flaw |
CVE-2002-0656
|
| VCID-5wr7-u8pq-dyfp | security update |
CVE-2014-0160
|
| VCID-638m-dfwf-7bdv | openssl: Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks |
CVE-2024-6119
|
| VCID-65fz-myrg-quey | openssl: incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection |
CVE-2021-23839
|
| VCID-6csa-4qxe-xbbk | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0702
|
| VCID-6k6r-2jsq-aqgr | OpenSSL contains multiple vulnerabilities including the possible remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2006-3738
|
| VCID-6mua-rkdu-87ay | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds write in BIO filter |
CVE-2025-68160
|
| VCID-6pd1-d9gx-kfc1 | Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. |
CVE-2021-4044
GHSA-mmjf-f5jw-w72q |
| VCID-6ptm-71xf-eqgp | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2021-23840
GHSA-qgm6-9472-pwq7 |
| VCID-6t8y-jh7t-67cf | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2011-4619
|
| VCID-6zka-x9q6-4fcy | openssl: excessive allocation of memory in dtls1_preprocess_fragment() |
CVE-2016-6308
|
| VCID-71yj-bmak-pkdu | Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL, the worst of which could result in remote code execution. |
CVE-2022-3602
GHSA-8rwr-x37p-mx23 |
| VCID-74wu-sup9-cybb |
CVE-2026-28386
|
|
| VCID-77x3-jdm1-sbbr | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0705
|
| VCID-7f9q-mhsr-8bfq | openssl: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group |
CVE-2026-2673
|
| VCID-7j76-5w6r-3ubv | security update |
CVE-2014-3568
|
| VCID-7jae-7w73-myb5 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-3195
|
| VCID-7w87-xkyf-9fgx | CAN-2003-0543/0544 OpenSSL ASN.1 protocol crashes |
CVE-2003-0543
|
| VCID-7xwq-vdej-ayg1 | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via type confusion in PKCS#7 signature verification |
CVE-2026-22796
|
| VCID-7ygr-6dqp-m3hh | security update |
CVE-2018-0734
|
| VCID-87vs-4p6w-xbgq |
CVE-2026-31789
|
|
| VCID-88p4-kcyt-fbck | Multiple information disclosure vulnerabilities in OpenSSL allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2019-1547
|
| VCID-8ch2-c1gk-dugh | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2011-1945
|
| VCID-8gde-1md7-5yak | OpenSSL 3.0.0 through 3.3.2 on the PowerPC architecture is vulnerable to a Minerva attack, exploitable by measuring the time of signing of random messages using the EVP_DigestSign API, and then using the private key to extract the K value (nonce) from the signatures. Next, based on the bit size of the extracted nonce, one can compare the signing time of full-sized nonces to signatures that used smaller nonces, via statistical tests. There is a side-channel in the P-364 curve that allows private key extraction (also, there is a dependency between the bit size of K and the size of the side channel). NOTE: This CVE is disputed because the OpenSSL security policy explicitly notes that any side channels which require same physical system to be detected are outside of the threat model for the software. The timing signal is so small that it is infeasible to be detected without having the attacking process running on the same physical system. |
CVE-2025-27587
|
| VCID-8jzs-ygaz-r7c6 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2016-0701
|
| VCID-8s28-acfa-kkhj | NULL Pointer Dereference An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3. |
CVE-2023-0217
GHSA-vxrh-cpg7-8vjr |
| VCID-8tne-314n-ekd8 | Three vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL via a commercial test suite for the TLS protocol developed by Codenomicon Ltd. |
CVE-2004-0112
|
| VCID-8tsy-8bd2-7ybe | A buffer underflow vulnerability and an information disclosure vulnerability have been discovered in OpenSSL. |
CVE-2007-5135
|
| VCID-8uhr-19zz-n3b7 | Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or data containing them may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service. An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers - most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by periods. When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large (these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the sub-identifiers in bytes (*). With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names / identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching algorithms. Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or decrypt, or digest passed data. Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose of display, the severity is considered low. In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509 certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature. The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a 100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client authentication. In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects, such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern, and the severity is therefore considered low. |
CVE-2023-2650
|
| VCID-93qs-cwuv-13dc | OpenSSL in Apple Mac OS X 10.6.x before 10.6.5 does not properly perform arithmetic, which allows remote attackers to bypass X.509 certificate authentication via an arbitrary certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority. |
CVE-2010-1378
|
| VCID-95ub-7a6n-afdg | openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection |
CVE-2022-2068
|
| VCID-995z-np7r-abe9 | OpenSSL 0.9.8c-1 up to versions before 0.9.8g-9 on Debian-based operating systems uses a random number generator that generates predictable numbers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force guessing attacks against cryptographic keys. |
CVE-2008-0166
|
| VCID-99xj-17z4-1qhe | openssl-src heap memory corruption with RSA private key operation The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA instructions. This issue makes the RSA implementation with 2048 bit private keys incorrect on such machines and memory corruption will happen during the computation. As a consequence of the memory corruption an attacker may be able to trigger a remote code execution on the machine performing the computation. SSL/TLS servers or other servers using 2048 bit RSA private keys running on machines supporting AVX512IFMA instructions of the X86_64 architecture are affected by this issue. |
CVE-2022-2274
GHSA-735f-pg76-fxc4 |
| VCID-9b9g-yngp-7kd7 | openssl: OpenSSL: Data integrity bypass in `openssl dgst` command due to silent truncation |
CVE-2025-15469
|
| VCID-9gqm-1tcm-2kga | Improper Certificate Validation A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. |
CVE-2023-0464
|
| VCID-9nmg-h851-gfcq | openssl: Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM |
CVE-2025-9231
|
| VCID-9umk-zzdr-1bbb | A certain Apple patch for OpenSSL in Apple OS X 10.9.2 and earlier uses a Trust Evaluation Agent (TEA) feature without terminating certain TLS/SSL handshakes as specified in the SSL_CTX_set_verify callback function's documentation, which allows remote attackers to bypass extra verification within a custom application via a crafted certificate chain that is acceptable to TEA but not acceptable to that application. |
CVE-2014-2234
|
| VCID-a1dj-m3pz-ckhy | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2010-5298
|
| VCID-a2an-s4s7-v3f5 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0293
|
| VCID-aa9w-ntqw-pfbt | Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL, the worst of which could result in denial of service. |
CVE-2020-1968
|
| VCID-aahy-5hjp-n3f2 | security update |
CVE-2015-1791
|
| VCID-aens-jq7w-f7bh | Double Free The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue. |
CVE-2022-4450
GHSA-v5w6-wcm8-jm4q |
| VCID-ak99-61ca-xbdd | security flaw |
CVE-2003-0078
|
| VCID-amuv-hah5-xqeh | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2109
|
| VCID-antn-nu5a-7yf6 | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed TimeStamp Response |
CVE-2025-69420
|
| VCID-ap59-pps5-rqg5 | security flaw |
CVE-2004-0975
|
| VCID-arx1-r22b-6bbp | security update |
CVE-2014-3572
|
| VCID-av2d-fnbx-cudm | security update |
CVE-2014-3508
|
| VCID-b1m6-r1bv-d7gr | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in PolarSSL, the worst of which might allow a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2013-0169
|
| VCID-b1zk-6dne-qydk | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2014-0198
|
| VCID-b253-fb1w-yfcn | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which might allow attackers to access sensitive information. |
CVE-2016-7055
|
| VCID-b3u8-1a2y-judf | Improper Authentication Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be mislead by removing adding or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the application has to call EVP_EncryptUpdate() (or EVP_CipherUpdate()) with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input buffer length. The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such a call instead of performing the associated data authentication operation. The empty data thus will not be authenticated. As this issue does not affect non-empty associated data authentication and we expect it to be rare for an application to use empty associated data entries this is qualified as Low severity issue. |
CVE-2023-2975
|
| VCID-baa9-1j6z-4yfr | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2017-3737
|
| VCID-bfv6-sbnh-5uh5 | openssl: SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread |
CVE-2024-5535
|
| VCID-bgfn-nz3n-6qgg | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2018-0733
|
| VCID-bnvh-m5tp-4qcd | openssl: information disclosure in fork() |
CVE-2019-1549
|
| VCID-bz8e-e953-b7b1 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2017-3735
|
| VCID-c2uj-69s7-jkbn | openssl: incomplete fix of CVE-2012-2110 for 0.9.x |
CVE-2012-2131
|
| VCID-c6d9-pkcq-9bdt | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2011-3210
|
| VCID-cef8-2p5t-bff7 |
CVE-2026-31790
|
|
| VCID-cepc-ff12-syf7 | Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to conduct multiple attacks, including the injection of arbitrary data into encrypted byte streams. |
CVE-2009-1379
|
| VCID-chgr-9utt-kqbp | openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution due to out-of-bounds write in PKCS#12 processing |
CVE-2025-69419
|
| VCID-cj9q-gyca-4yca | Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to conduct multiple attacks, including the injection of arbitrary data into encrypted byte streams. |
CVE-2009-1377
|
| VCID-cjvp-qu4p-gyb3 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-4252
|
| VCID-d1w2-tn9c-kfd1 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0209
|
| VCID-d418-pfnm-5bcs | security flaw |
CVE-2002-0655
|
| VCID-d4rs-rag3-cfcy | openssl: OpenSSL: Remote code execution or Denial of Service via oversized Initialization Vector in CMS parsing |
CVE-2025-15467
|
| VCID-d576-nwq8-ryfw | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0704
|
| VCID-d83w-756y-3bfv | Use After Free The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected. |
CVE-2023-0215
GHSA-r7jw-wp68-3xch |
| VCID-dpf6-tr3m-jfc1 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2011-3207
|
| VCID-ds3k-7ny3-7qbh | OpenSSL, probably 0.9.6, does not verify the Basic Constraints for an intermediate CA-signed certificate, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack, a related issue to CVE-2002-0970. |
CVE-2009-0653
|
| VCID-e15t-7nz1-8yhq | security update |
CVE-2016-6302
|
| VCID-e5k7-b7vc-cyav | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2009-3245
|
| VCID-efpm-7cfa-z7hx | openssl: Unbounded memory growth with session handling in TLSv1.3 |
CVE-2024-2511
|
| VCID-eqss-dzdc-tkbj | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2019-1551
|
| VCID-f2na-rtsu-ffad |
CVE-2026-28387
|
|
| VCID-fakv-qsaf-vyfp | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-6306
|
| VCID-fbj8-csfj-ayec | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2178
|
| VCID-fcn3-udyh-p7d9 | openssl: Encrypt-Then-Mac renegotiation crash |
CVE-2017-3733
|
| VCID-ff6u-8hrf-wkge | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-2939
|
| VCID-fme4-s7d2-z7bh | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0288
|
| VCID-fnqs-6m4x-mfa7 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2011-0014
|
| VCID-fqqf-yk1n-ebad | security update |
CVE-2014-3512
|
| VCID-frd6-gt2a-afhv | Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL, the worst of which could result in denial of service. |
CVE-2022-2097
GHSA-3wx7-46ch-7rq2 |
| VCID-fwwa-41df-zqfk | openssl: Out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap |
CVE-2025-9230
|
| VCID-fxq1-xgrm-bba3 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-0742
|
| VCID-fyff-qt58-sufq | Three vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL via a commercial test suite for the TLS protocol developed by Codenomicon Ltd. |
CVE-2004-0079
|
| VCID-fz23-zbk9-gugq | Multiple vulnerabilities in the Sun JDK and JRE allow for several attacks, including the remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2009-2409
|
| VCID-fz2f-ge2n-1qcs | security update |
CVE-2015-1790
|
| VCID-g3ep-ebus-43hj | security flaw |
CVE-2003-0147
|
| VCID-g3wr-77wa-r7a6 | OpenSSL contains multiple vulnerabilities including the possible remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2006-2940
|
| VCID-g83k-2a8k-tbeb | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2012-2110
|
| VCID-g8at-dasq-h3fb | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to excessive memory allocation in TLS 1.3 certificate compression |
CVE-2025-66199
|
| VCID-ge3g-23f7-mbfs | openssl: weak public value accepted during Diffie Hellman key exchange |
CVE-2011-5095
|
| VCID-gnpm-mnpa-3kdg | Timing based side channel A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection. |
CVE-2022-4304
GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 |
| VCID-gqj1-zam7-c3bv | Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 42.0.0-44.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt. If you are building cryptography source ("sdist") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions. |
CVE-2024-12797
GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g |
| VCID-gsbn-6t86-7kf9 | Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters |
CVE-2022-0778
GHSA-x3mh-jvjw-3xwx |
| VCID-gxy4-4rja-ufd2 | certificate verification bypass |
CVE-2025-4575
|
| VCID-gz3p-bw6x-eybn | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2011-4576
|
| VCID-gz4c-x1gb-muat | openssl: Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access |
CVE-2024-9143
|
| VCID-gz52-5f4f-wfbp | Three vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL via a commercial test suite for the TLS protocol developed by Codenomicon Ltd. |
CVE-2004-0081
|
| VCID-gz7j-a11r-y3ha | security update |
CVE-2015-1788
|
| VCID-h1xy-ud9q-c7hg | security flaw |
CVE-2002-0659
|
| VCID-h6n1-tsqt-17bw | Generation of Weak Initialization Vector (IV) Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers. Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes. When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB. For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse. Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical. Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary. OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 is vulnerable to this issue. |
CVE-2023-5363
|
| VCID-h7td-61b7-q7aw | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2018-0737
|
| VCID-h9sp-nvxw-eybd | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2014-0224
|
| VCID-hgvf-vxhr-cye8 |
CVE-2026-28388
|
|
| VCID-hjgb-ch1w-nbfs | Improper Certificate Validation The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications. |
CVE-2023-0466
|
| VCID-hpd4-t99c-zffu | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2021-3450
GHSA-8hfj-xrj2-pm22 |
| VCID-hpev-apm4-sqfw | Null pointer dereference in PKCS12 parsing Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. |
CVE-2024-0727
GHSA-9v9h-cgj8-h64p |
| VCID-j22e-uf4q-f7aq | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2012-0050
|
| VCID-j51b-cm37-6fdj | openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service through crafted PKCS#12 file |
CVE-2025-11187
|
| VCID-j6cy-y4ny-tfa5 | OpenSSL contains multiple vulnerabilities including the possible remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2006-4343
|
| VCID-jau7-gfz8-dkfa | The renegotiation vulnerability in SSL protocol |
CVE-2009-3555
GHSA-f7w7-6pjc-wwm6 VU#120541 |
| VCID-jfbw-fngk-fuev | security update |
CVE-2015-0286
|
| VCID-jq5s-hzam-zfda | openssl: Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers |
CVE-2024-4741
|
| VCID-jqga-xg7c-93e9 | security update |
CVE-2015-0205
|
| VCID-jv1d-sb5f-xfga | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0208
|
| VCID-jw9j-13y5-fkdw | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-6305
|
| VCID-k8ap-r7e3-cuem | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0800
|
| VCID-kawy-md4v-c3ab | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-0740
|
| VCID-kgyj-s8ch-3kaz | Dual_EC_DRBG: weak pseudo random number generator |
CVE-2007-6755
|
| VCID-m191-295u-tba7 | security update |
CVE-2016-6303
|
| VCID-m968-yqkj-rfak | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2014-0221
|
| VCID-mdgj-8zzd-gfgw | Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to conduct multiple attacks, including the injection of arbitrary data into encrypted byte streams. |
CVE-2009-1378
|
| VCID-mer9-m4yv-bkfu | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2013-0166
|
| VCID-mg21-k76s-sqfp | openssl: Timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation |
CVE-2024-13176
|
| VCID-mug7-xnvy-skbn | security update |
CVE-2016-2842
|
| VCID-mycr-9zma-z7aq | security update |
CVE-2014-5139
|
| VCID-myuq-u3as-g3ah | Carry Propagation bug There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. |
CVE-2021-4160
|
| VCID-n2dd-wcvx-dqaj | security update |
CVE-2014-3570
|
| VCID-ncw4-3azc-1fb5 | Denial of service by double-checked locking in openssl-src If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this results in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy processing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered to be a common setup. Policy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling either `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()' or `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' functions. |
CVE-2022-3996
GHSA-vr8j-hgmm-jh9r |
| VCID-ngyw-a3jk-43hb | Certain checks on untrusted certificates can be bypassed. |
CVE-2015-1793
|
| VCID-nn88-n5r3-hyae | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2108
|
| VCID-nqt4-k72v-mqfn | openssl: DTLS NULL deref crash on early ChangeCipherSpec request |
CVE-2009-1386
|
| VCID-nr5y-ve9m-zfeh | Out-of-bounds Read ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). |
CVE-2021-3712
GHSA-q9wj-f4qw-6vfj |
| VCID-ns5p-snzn-mqg6 | security update |
CVE-2014-3569
|
| VCID-nsjj-szaq-1kgd | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-6304
|
| VCID-nw1q-k3cv-r7e3 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenOffice and LibreOffice, the worst of which may result in execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2006-4339
|
| VCID-p7ca-uc7n-mfc4 | openssl: OpenSSL: Information disclosure and data tampering via specific low-level OCB encryption/decryption calls |
CVE-2025-69418
|
| VCID-pbjc-7myj-tqas | security update |
CVE-2016-8610
|
| VCID-pe34-qqqg-3qe1 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-0433
|
| VCID-pfra-n989-7ua3 | security update |
CVE-2014-3511
|
| VCID-pfup-gf7w-uqdd | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2107
|
| VCID-pmeb-x4b1-uyfu | security update |
CVE-2014-3571
|
| VCID-ppzc-crpq-fyhf | security update |
CVE-2014-3510
|
| VCID-pz6q-fhzq-gfa8 | openssl: ECC private leak (disclosure of TLS server's private key) |
CVE-2011-4354
|
| VCID-q2ae-5r8q-3fbv | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') The `c_rehash` script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the `c_rehash` script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL `rehash` command line tool. |
CVE-2022-1292
|
| VCID-q5a1-fsuc-3uea | security update |
CVE-2015-0206
|
| VCID-q6vs-dmwa-9fhh | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2021-23841
GHSA-84rm-qf37-fgc2 |
| VCID-q78j-864j-pkbq | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2017-3736
|
| VCID-q7te-hzsm-fkck | openssl: Use After Free for large message sizes |
CVE-2016-6309
|
| VCID-qdyb-f47a-kbf4 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2011-4577
|
| VCID-qe39-k8u8-ckf9 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2012-0884
|
| VCID-qu62-xjwj-47eu | several |
CVE-2013-6449
|
| VCID-qup9-qy11-fqhe | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in mbed TLS, the worst of which could lead to the remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2015-7575
|
| VCID-r15j-bw3g-m3bf | security update |
CVE-2014-3506
|
| VCID-r2qs-dmuf-zkev | openssl: Excessive time spent checking DSA keys and parameters |
CVE-2024-4603
|
| VCID-r616-sqha-pudt | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2177
|
| VCID-r69y-4x9c-euhv | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0207
|
| VCID-r791-tdk3-4bet | OpenSSL before 0.9.8k on WIN64 and certain other platforms does not properly handle a malformed ASN.1 structure, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid memory access and application crash) by placing this structure in the public key of a certificate, as demonstrated by an RSA public key. |
CVE-2009-0789
|
| VCID-r86q-xr8t-jfcr | security update |
CVE-2014-8176
|
| VCID-rbqf-a1ce-kbf9 | An error in OpenSSL might allow for a Denial of Service when printing certificate details. |
CVE-2009-0590
|
| VCID-rgue-at15-k7a2 | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to type confusion in PKCS#12 file processing |
CVE-2026-22795
|
| VCID-rj5g-u4mb-q7df | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0799
|
| VCID-rkj9-zbcz-qkec | Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to conduct multiple attacks, including the injection of arbitrary data into encrypted byte streams. |
CVE-2009-1387
|
| VCID-rmcw-df8y-wqgn | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0291
|
| VCID-rrtk-cq5p-fkdg | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2180
|
| VCID-rtdv-dvg8-ubek | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2011-4108
|
| VCID-rv85-x8rf-7ubu | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-3194
|
| VCID-rxkb-79tg-zuaz | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-1633
|
| VCID-rzqy-gheq-cqgg | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Oracle's JRE and JDK software suites allowing remote attackers to remotely execute arbitrary code, obtain information, and cause Denial of Service. |
CVE-2015-4000
|
| VCID-scut-h7tx-vkak | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2012-2686
|
| VCID-se78-wb3q-ska5 | security flaw |
CVE-2002-1568
|
| VCID-skum-1n7x-efc6 | security flaw |
CVE-2002-0657
|
| VCID-sn5k-3e59-7ba8 | Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() does not make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large P, it does not check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. |
CVE-2023-5678
|
| VCID-sp1b-ze8y-37gm | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2012-2333
|
| VCID-syf6-6kyx-9khk | Two vulnerabilities might allow for a Denial of Service of daemons using OpenSSL. |
CVE-2008-0891
|
| VCID-t4t8-753w-zqc5 | POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts XMM registers on Windows Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap: OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000 The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue. |
CVE-2023-4807
|
| VCID-t64k-wgjb-fkhz | openssl: NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG downgrade-to-disabled ciphersuite attack |
CVE-2008-7270
|
| VCID-t9w1-a3z2-qqar | Out-of-bounds Read Issue summary: The AES-XTS cipher decryption implementation for 64 bit ARM platform contains a bug that could cause it to read past the input buffer, leading to a crash. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-XTS algorithm on the 64 bit ARM platform can crash in rare circumstances. The AES-XTS algorithm is usually used for disk encryption. The AES-XTS cipher decryption implementation for 64 bit ARM platform will read past the end of the ciphertext buffer if the ciphertext size is 4 mod 5 in 16 byte blocks, e.g. 144 bytes or 1024 bytes. If the memory after the ciphertext buffer is unmapped, this will trigger a crash which results in a denial of service. If an attacker can control the size and location of the ciphertext buffer being decrypted by an application using AES-XTS on 64 bit ARM, the application is affected. This is fairly unlikely making this issue a Low severity one. |
CVE-2023-1255
|
| VCID-tahe-we86-xkfk | programming error |
CVE-2013-4353
|
| VCID-te2m-dwzt-eff1 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0798
|
| VCID-tk2r-atbr-73ge | Out-of-bounds Read A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. |
CVE-2022-4203
GHSA-w67w-mw4j-8qrv |
| VCID-ttju-tw1d-f3ay | Improper Certificate Validation The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). |
CVE-2022-1343
GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7 |
| VCID-tw8y-th2e-x7ex | openssl: Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys |
CVE-2023-6237
|
| VCID-tyx8-vuwh-ukhf | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to disclose sensitive information and complete weak handshakes. |
CVE-2015-1794
|
| VCID-u6wt-cy4d-1uf1 | openssl: Mishandling C bitwise-shift operations making easier to bypass protection mechanisms |
CVE-2000-1254
|
| VCID-ue9p-afzm-8ye6 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0797
|
| VCID-ut4t-h9gc-cyds | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Dropbear, the worst of which could result in a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2018-0739
|
| VCID-uwhu-c6v5-vqcb | security update |
CVE-2014-0076
|
| VCID-v45q-mw2w-67g5 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0285
|
| VCID-vbc4-wb48-6qfa | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which might allow attackers to access sensitive information. |
CVE-2017-3730
|
| VCID-vcz8-amaa-hycq | The default configuration on OpenSSL before 0.9.8 uses MD5 for creating message digests instead of a more cryptographically strong algorithm, which makes it easier for remote attackers to forge certificates with a valid certificate authority signature. |
CVE-2005-2946
|
| VCID-vhkt-tbz6-wuf7 | Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. |
CVE-2023-3446
|
| VCID-vqe4-4q4r-aybe | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-2105
|
| VCID-vsbh-rmt3-kyd9 | security update |
CVE-2014-3507
|
| VCID-vy7f-pzhe-4ff7 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0292
|
| VCID-vyur-pwqe-rubw | security update |
CVE-2015-1792
|
| VCID-w8rh-s9ft-s3ex | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-0204
|
| VCID-w9yg-3dbq-8qge | openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed PKCS#12 file processing |
CVE-2025-69421
|
| VCID-wa29-yua6-3kdr | security update |
CVE-2015-1789
|
| VCID-wgkp-dnxf-gbcu | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-3864
|
| VCID-wp1w-7td9-87gs | openssl: excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header() |
CVE-2016-6307
|
| VCID-wuwm-ksb1-6qd5 |
CVE-2026-28390
|
|
| VCID-wvqv-zs7x-qqh3 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which allows attackers to conduct a time based side-channel attack. |
CVE-2016-7052
|
| VCID-wwc4-7u5n-mbh2 | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code and other attacks. |
CVE-2010-4180
|
| VCID-wx1m-8utp-rkgm | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst allowing remote attackers to decrypt TLS sessions. |
CVE-2016-0703
|
| VCID-wxvb-73gj-p3eu | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). |
CVE-2022-1434
GHSA-638m-m8mh-7gw2 |
| VCID-wyps-ympf-1bf6 | security update |
CVE-2014-8275
|
| VCID-x2wm-3tk7-wbbv | Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network. |
CVE-2023-0286
GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 |
| VCID-x8uc-src9-6uck | Multiple vulnerabilities were found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2020-1967
GHSA-jq65-29v4-4x35 |
| VCID-xap5-djda-2uem | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Oracle JRE/JDK, allowing both local and remote attackers to compromise various Java components. |
CVE-2014-3566
|
| VCID-xbme-7ph4-p3bz | security update |
CVE-2016-2182
|
| VCID-xbzp-nuch-h3hq | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which might allow attackers to access sensitive information. |
CVE-2017-3732
|
| VCID-xfhx-ng1m-myfh | security update |
CVE-2014-3505
|
| VCID-xnhs-4v7t-p3hv | Excessive Iteration Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value, if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the "-check" option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. |
CVE-2023-3817
|
| VCID-xq7s-zrwb-yffw | Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL, the worst of which could result in remote code execution. |
CVE-2022-3786
GHSA-h8jm-2x53-xhp5 |
| VCID-xqt3-3um9-8faq | NULL Pointer Dereference A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data. |
CVE-2023-0401
GHSA-vrh7-x64v-7vxq |
| VCID-y71f-vhew-p3d2 | openssl: Crash in ssleay_rand_bytes due to locking regression |
CVE-2015-3216
|
| VCID-yb9y-4y13-efg6 |
CVE-2015-5738
|
|
| VCID-yba7-p3a3-yydb | security update |
CVE-2016-2179
|
| VCID-yc1k-xf7p-5kb8 | CAN-2003-0543/0544 OpenSSL ASN.1 protocol crashes |
CVE-2003-0545
|
| VCID-ycu7-vn9v-kyce | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which could allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2021-3449
GHSA-83mx-573x-5rw9 |
| VCID-yfky-n79d-cff2 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, the worst of which may lead to a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2017-3738
|
| VCID-yfyq-yq4j-5kc5 | OpenSSL contains multiple vulnerabilities including the possible remote execution of arbitrary code. |
CVE-2006-2937
|
| VCID-ypgh-pszg-wkcx | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2012-1165
|
| VCID-yqkw-e99v-jbgt | A vulnerability in OpenSSL might allow remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service condition. |
CVE-2020-1971
|
| VCID-ytt1-rag5-bycs | An error in the OpenSSL certificate chain validation might allow for spoofing attacks. |
CVE-2008-5077
|
| VCID-yw4y-nz73-w7gq | Multiple information disclosure vulnerabilities in OpenSSL allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2019-1563
|
| VCID-ywwy-nbey-kqa1 | security flaw |
CVE-2003-0131
|
| VCID-z2kn-pwrf-wffp | OpenSSL contains a vulnerability allowing execution of arbitrary code or a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2007-4995
|
| VCID-z3fb-nqcp-g3fq | Multiple Information Disclosure vulnerabilities in OpenSSL allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. |
CVE-2018-5407
|
| VCID-zah1-wsjc-8kdm | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL allowing remote attackers to determine private keys or cause a Denial of Service. |
CVE-2006-7250
|
| VCID-zf5b-ajub-zue3 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL that can result in either Denial of Service or information disclosure. |
CVE-2015-1787
|
| VCID-zfwq-vtun-y3gm | security update |
CVE-2018-0735
|
| VCID-zhwv-pq2x-8bey | Improper Resource Shutdown or Release The `OPENSSL_LH_flush()` function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. |
CVE-2022-1473
GHSA-g323-fr93-4j3c |
| VCID-zkc9-huk8-27bc |
CVE-2026-28389
|
|
| VCID-zw8g-wxwj-hycz | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, possibly allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
CVE-2014-0195
|
| VCID-zypm-ffez-dqbz | security update |
CVE-2016-7056
|