Search for packages
| purl | pkg:deb/debian/proftpd-dfsg@1.3.7a%2Bdfsg-12%2Bdeb11u2 |
| Next non-vulnerable version | 1.3.8.c+dfsg-4+deb13u1 |
| Latest non-vulnerable version | 1.3.8.c+dfsg-4+deb13u1 |
| Risk | 3.4 |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Fixed by |
|---|---|---|
|
VCID-gw9f-rc1s-8udd
Aliases: CVE-2024-57392 |
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Proftpd commit 4017eff8 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) on the FTP service by sending a maliciously crafted message to the ProFTPD service port. |
Affected by 1 other vulnerability. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
|
VCID-jzn6-bzzf-nugp
Aliases: CVE-2023-48795 GHSA-45x7-px36-x8w8 |
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. |
Affected by 1 other vulnerability. |
|
VCID-pcah-e3hh-gbd7
Aliases: CVE-2024-48651 |
In ProFTPD through 1.3.8b before cec01cc, supplemental group inheritance grants unintended access to GID 0 because of the lack of supplemental groups from mod_sql. |
Affected by 1 other vulnerability. |
|
VCID-u7k3-9pb6-nqa8
Aliases: CVE-2023-51713 |
make_ftp_cmd in main.c in ProFTPD before 1.3.8a has a one-byte out-of-bounds read, and daemon crash, because of mishandling of quote/backslash semantics. |
Affected by 1 other vulnerability. |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Aliases |
|---|---|---|
| VCID-17q4-65b3-mbbg | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in ProFTPd, the worst of which may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
CVE-2020-9272
|
| VCID-6zv5-sn2d-ffa6 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in ProFTPd, the worst of which may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
CVE-2019-18217
|
| VCID-8yrv-hee2-9qdc | A vulnerability in ProFTPD could result in the arbitrary execution of code. |
CVE-2019-12815
|
| VCID-fn5e-rmve-c3f4 | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in ProFTPd, the worst of which may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
CVE-2020-9273
|
| VCID-jczb-y4fh-xucn | A vulnerability has been discovered in ProFTPd which could result in memory disclosure. |
CVE-2021-46854
|
| VCID-tc5c-pyzn-ekh1 | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server. |
CVE-2019-19270
|
| VCID-wwz1-zb24-7qgy | Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in ProFTPd, the worst of which may lead to arbitrary code execution. |
CVE-2019-19269
|