Search for packages
| purl | pkg:deb/debian/rails@2:5.2.4.3%2Bdfsg-1?distro=trixie |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Fixed by |
|---|---|---|
| This package is not known to be affected by vulnerabilities. | ||
| Vulnerability | Summary | Aliases |
|---|---|---|
| VCID-895a-ydc5-zfg6 | Circumvention of file size limits in ActiveStorage There is a vulnerability in ActiveStorage's S3 adapter that allows the Content-Length of a direct file upload to be modified by an end user. Versions Affected: rails < 5.2.4.2, rails < 6.0.3.1 Not affected: Applications that do not use the direct upload functionality of the ActiveStorage S3 adapter. Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1 Impact ------ Utilizing this vulnerability, an attacker can control the Content-Length of an S3 direct upload URL without receiving a new signature from the server. This could be used to bypass controls in place on the server to limit upload size. Workarounds ----------- This is a low-severity security issue. As such, no workaround is necessarily until such time as the application can be upgraded. |
CVE-2020-8162
GHSA-m42x-37p3-fv5w |
| VCID-a6sp-18av-wya6 | Possible Strong Parameters Bypass in ActionPack There is a strong parameters bypass vector in ActionPack. Versions Affected: rails <= 6.0.3 Not affected: rails < 5.0.0 Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1 Impact ------ In some cases user supplied information can be inadvertently leaked from Strong Parameters. Specifically the return value of `each`, or `each_value`, or `each_pair` will return the underlying "untrusted" hash of data that was read from the parameters. Applications that use this return value may be inadvertently use untrusted user input. Impacted code will look something like this: ``` def update # Attacker has included the parameter: `{ is_admin: true }` User.update(clean_up_params) end def clean_up_params params.each { |k, v| SomeModel.check(v) if k == :name } end ``` Note the mistaken use of `each` in the `clean_up_params` method in the above example. Workarounds ----------- Do not use the return values of `each`, `each_value`, or `each_pair` in your application. |
CVE-2020-8164
GHSA-8727-m6gj-mc37 |
| VCID-es1t-7196-4kbb | CSRF Vulnerability in rails-ujs There is a vulnerability in rails-ujs that allows attackers to send CSRF tokens to wrong domains. Versions Affected: rails <= 6.0.3 Not affected: Applications which don't use rails-ujs. Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1 Impact ------ This is a regression of CVE-2015-1840. In the scenario where an attacker might be able to control the href attribute of an anchor tag or the action attribute of a form tag that will trigger a POST action, the attacker can set the href or action to a cross-origin URL, and the CSRF token will be sent. Workarounds ----------- To work around this problem, change code that allows users to control the href attribute of an anchor tag or the action attribute of a form tag to filter the user parameters. For example, code like this: link_to params to code like this: link_to filtered_params def filtered_params # Filter just the parameters that you trust end |
CVE-2020-8167
GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 |
| VCID-mnkw-23eu-bkgc | Ability to forge per-form CSRF tokens in Rails It is possible to, given a global CSRF token such as the one present in the authenticity_token meta tag, forge a per-form CSRF token for any action for that session. Impact ------ Given the ability to extract the global CSRF token, an attacker would be able to construct a per-form CSRF token for that session. Workarounds ----------- This is a low-severity security issue. As such, no workaround is necessarily until such time as the application can be upgraded. |
CVE-2020-8166
GHSA-jp5v-5gx4-jmj9 |
| VCID-t684-yp58-hkg8 | ActiveSupport potentially unintended unmarshalling of user-provided objects in MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore In ActiveSupport, there is potentially unexpected behaviour in the MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore where, when untrusted user input is written to the cache store using the `raw: true` parameter, re-reading the result from the cache can evaluate the user input as a Marshalled object instead of plain text. Vulnerable code looks like: ``` data = cache.fetch("demo", raw: true) { untrusted_string } ``` Versions Affected: rails < 5.2.5, rails < 6.0.4 Not affected: Applications not using MemCacheStore or RedisCacheStore. Applications that do not use the `raw` option when storing untrusted user input. Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1 Impact ------ Unmarshalling of untrusted user input can have impact up to and including RCE. At a minimum, this vulnerability allows an attacker to inject untrusted Ruby objects into a web application. In addition to upgrading to the latest versions of Rails, developers should ensure that whenever they are calling `Rails.cache.fetch` they are using consistent values of the `raw` parameter for both reading and writing, especially in the case of the RedisCacheStore which does not, prior to these changes, detect if data was serialized using the raw option upon deserialization. Workarounds ----------- It is recommended that application developers apply the suggested patch or upgrade to the latest release as soon as possible. If this is not possible, we recommend ensuring that all user-provided strings cached using the `raw` argument should be double-checked to ensure that they conform to the expected format. |
CVE-2020-8165
GHSA-2p68-f74v-9wc6 |