Search for packages
| purl | pkg:pypi/keylime@6.3.2 |
| Next non-vulnerable version | None. |
| Latest non-vulnerable version | None. |
| Risk |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Fixed by |
|---|---|---|
|
VCID-bkzk-g3pz-6ka5
Aliases: CVE-2022-3500 PYSEC-2022-42995 |
A vulnerability was found in keylime. This security issue happens in some circumstances, due to some improperly handled exceptions, there exists the possibility that a rogue agent could create errors on the verifier that stopped attestation attempts for that host leaving it in an attested state but not verifying that anymore. |
Affected by 3 other vulnerabilities. |
|
VCID-brn1-4b8e-kqhf
Aliases: CVE-2023-38201 GHSA-f4r5-q63f-gcww PYSEC-2023-160 |
A flaw was found in the Keylime registrar that could allow a bypass of the challenge-response protocol during agent registration. This issue may allow an attacker to impersonate an agent and hide the true status of a monitored machine if the fake agent is added to the verifier list by a legitimate user, resulting in a breach of the integrity of the registrar database. |
Affected by 1 other vulnerability. |
|
VCID-e4rm-c82g-fbff
Aliases: CVE-2022-1053 GHSA-jf66-3q76-h5p5 PYSEC-2022-184 |
Keylime does not enforce that the agent registrar data is the same when the tenant uses it for validation of the EK and identity quote and the verifier for validating the integrity quote. This allows an attacker to use one AK, EK pair from a real TPM to pass EK validation and give the verifier an AK of a software TPM. A successful attack breaks the entire chain of trust because a not validated AK is used by the verifier. This issue is worse if the validation happens first and then the agent gets added to the verifier because the timing is easier and the verifier does not validate the regcount entry being equal to 1, |
Affected by 4 other vulnerabilities. |
|
VCID-mqxg-478p-23cn
Aliases: CVE-2026-1709 GHSA-4jqp-9qjv-57m2 PYSEC-2026-74 |
A flaw was found in Keylime. The Keylime registrar, since version 7.12.0, does not enforce client-side Transport Layer Security (TLS) authentication. This authentication bypass vulnerability allows unauthenticated clients with network access to perform administrative operations, including listing agents, retrieving public Trusted Platform Module (TPM) data, and deleting agents, by connecting without presenting a client certificate. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 2 other vulnerabilities. |
|
VCID-v57m-t456-xkfd
Aliases: CVE-2023-3674 GHSA-g4wg-cfpf-9689 PYSEC-2023-128 |
A flaw was found in the keylime attestation verifier, which fails to flag a device's submitted TPM quote as faulty when the quote's signature does not validate for some reason. Instead, it will only emit an error in the log without flagging the device as untrusted. |
Affected by 2 other vulnerabilities. |
| Vulnerability | Summary | Aliases |
|---|---|---|
| This package is not known to fix vulnerabilities. | ||
| Date | Actor | Action | Vulnerability | Source | VulnerableCode Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-02T04:23:51.267778+00:00 | Pypa Importer | Affected by | VCID-mqxg-478p-23cn | https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2026-74.yaml | 38.6.0 |
| 2026-06-02T04:19:24.775578+00:00 | Pypa Importer | Affected by | VCID-brn1-4b8e-kqhf | https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2023-160.yaml | 38.6.0 |
| 2026-06-02T04:19:10.177544+00:00 | Pypa Importer | Affected by | VCID-v57m-t456-xkfd | https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2023-128.yaml | 38.6.0 |
| 2026-06-02T04:18:02.600366+00:00 | Pypa Importer | Affected by | VCID-bkzk-g3pz-6ka5 | https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2022-42995.yaml | 38.6.0 |
| 2026-06-02T04:17:20.171479+00:00 | Pypa Importer | Affected by | VCID-e4rm-c82g-fbff | https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2022-184.yaml | 38.6.0 |