Advisory details:
github_osv / GHSA-7qf6-h84j-8fq4
| Advisory ID | github_osv/GHSA-7qf6-h84j-8fq4 |
| Aliases | |
| Summary | OpenClaw: Microsoft Teams media fetch paths bypass shared SSRF guard model ## Impact Microsoft Teams media handling used mixed fetch paths for Graph metadata/content and attachment auth-retry flows. Some paths bypassed the shared SSRF guard model and created inconsistent host/DNS enforcement across redirect/fetch hops. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Latest published vulnerable version: `2026.2.25` - Affected range: `<= 2026.2.25` - Planned patched version for next release: `2026.2.26` ## Technical Details The Microsoft Teams attachment/media code previously relied on plugin-local fetch behavior in parts of the flow, instead of uniformly using shared guarded fetch logic with pinned DNS + policy checks. This could allow policy drift and SSRF boundary inconsistency between channel/plugin paths. The fix unifies this path by: - routing Microsoft Teams Graph message/hosted-content/attachment fetches through shared SSRF-guarded fetch paths, - routing auth-scope fallback attachment downloads through the same guarded policy model, - centralizing hostname-suffix allowlist policy helpers in `plugin-sdk` so channel/plugins use the same allowlist normalization and policy construction behavior. ## Fix Commit(s) - `57334cd7d85174d5f951de01114fd5801b063564` OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting. |
| Status | Published |
| Exploitability | 0.5 |
| Weighted Severity | 2.1 |
| Risk | 1.1 |
| Affected and Fixed Packages | Package Details |
| Introduced and Fixed Package Commit Patches | Package Commit Patches Details |
| System | Score | Found at |
|---|---|---|
| cvssv4 | 2.3 | https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-7qf6-h84j-8fq4/GHSA-7qf6-h84j-8fq4.json |
| generic_textual | LOW |
No EPSS data available for this advisory.
| Patch URL | |
|---|---|
| There are no known patches. | |
| Attack Vector (AV) | Attack Complexity (AC) | Attack Requirements (AT) | Privileges Required (PR) | User Interaction (UI) | Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC) | Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI) | Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA) | Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC) | Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI) | Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
network adjacent local physical |
low high |
none present |
none low high |
none passive active |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
There are no SSVC decisions available.