Advisory details:
github_osv / GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5
| Advisory ID | github_osv/GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5 |
| Aliases | |
| Summary | Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw: Node pairing reconnection could confuse approval scope state ### Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-83w9-h5wv-j9xm. This link is maintained to preserve external references. ### Original Description OpenClaw before 2026.5.27 contains a state mutation vulnerability in node pairing reconnection that allows paired nodes to confuse approval scope decisions. Attackers can exploit reconnection logic to restore or present broader node authority than intended, potentially bypassing approval restrictions. |
| Status | Published |
| Exploitability | 0.5 |
| Weighted Severity | 8.8 |
| Risk | 4.4 |
| Affected and Fixed Packages | Package Details |
| Introduced and Fixed Package Commit Patches | Package Commit Patches Details |
| System | Score | Found at |
|---|---|---|
| cvssv3.1 | 9.8 | https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/06/GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5/GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5.json |
| cvssv4 | 6.0 | https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/06/GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5/GHSA-c85p-9pvr-f7f5.json |
| generic_textual | MODERATE |
No EPSS data available for this advisory.
| Patch URL | |
|---|---|
| There are no known patches. | |
| Attack Vector (AV) | Attack Complexity (AC) | Privileges Required (PR) | User Interaction (UI) | Scope (S) | Confidentiality Impact (C) | Integrity Impact (I) | Availability Impact (A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
network adjacent_network local physical |
low high |
none low high |
none required |
unchanged changed |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
| Attack Vector (AV) | Attack Complexity (AC) | Attack Requirements (AT) | Privileges Required (PR) | User Interaction (UI) | Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC) | Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI) | Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA) | Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC) | Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI) | Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
network adjacent local physical |
low high |
none present |
none low high |
none passive active |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
There are no SSVC decisions available.