Advisory details:
github_osv / GHSA-pfv7-rr5m-qmv6
| Advisory ID | github_osv/GHSA-pfv7-rr5m-qmv6 |
| Aliases | |
| Summary | OpenClaw has auth inconsistency on local Browser Extension Relay /extension endpoint ### Summary When the optional Chrome extension relay is enabled, `/extension` accepted unauthenticated WebSocket upgrades while `/json/*` and `/cdp` required auth. ### Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected: `<= 2026.2.17` - Latest published npm version at triage time: `2026.2.17` ### Impact This is a local-only issue on loopback (`127.0.0.1`) and only applies when the extension relay feature is in use. A local process on the same machine could connect to `/extension` without the token and interfere with extension-relay behavior. No remote network exploit path is involved. ### Fix - Require gateway-token auth on both `/extension` and `/cdp` relay WebSocket endpoints. - Keep loopback/origin checks as defense-in-depth, not as authentication. - Use one token path in setup: `gateway.auth.token` / `OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_TOKEN`. ### Fix Commit(s) - `7e54b6c96feb1a5c30884f2b32037b8dadd0e532` OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting. |
| Status | Published |
| Exploitability | 0.5 |
| Weighted Severity | 4.6 |
| Risk | 2.3 |
| Affected and Fixed Packages | Package Details |
| Introduced and Fixed Package Commit Patches | Package Commit Patches Details |
| System | Score | Found at |
|---|---|---|
| cvssv4 | 5.1 | https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-pfv7-rr5m-qmv6/GHSA-pfv7-rr5m-qmv6.json |
| generic_textual | MODERATE |
No EPSS data available for this advisory.
| Patch URL | |
|---|---|
| There are no known patches. | |
| Attack Vector (AV) | Attack Complexity (AC) | Attack Requirements (AT) | Privileges Required (PR) | User Interaction (UI) | Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC) | Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI) | Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA) | Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC) | Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI) | Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
network adjacent local physical |
low high |
none present |
none low high |
none passive active |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
high low none |
There are no SSVC decisions available.