Staging Environment: Content and features may be unstable or change without notice.
Advisory details: github_osv / GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94
Advisory ID github_osv/GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94
Aliases CVE-2026-102554
Summary Google Guava: CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/MapMakerInternalMap deserialization triggers uncontrolled memory allocation # CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/MapMakerInternalMap native deserialization triggers uncontrolled memory allocation ## Summary `CompactHashMap`, `CompactHashSet`, and `MapMakerInternalMap` implement `readObject(ObjectInputStream)` by reading an attacker-controlled `elementCount` or `initialCapacity` from the stream. On the very first insertion during or after deserialization (for the `CompactHash*` collections, inside `allocArrays()`) or immediately during deserialization (for `MapMakerInternalMap`), the implementation eagerly allocates arrays sized to that full, unvalidated value (up to `CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE` = 2^30-1, ~1.07 billion, for example) before the rest of the stream's actual content has been consumed. A 72-byte malicious serialized stream containing a single tiny element can force a multi-gigabyte allocation and crash a JVM with `OutOfMemoryError`, dynamically confirmed against the current release. ## Details `CompactHashMap.readObject()` (`guava/src/com/google/common/collect/CompactHashMap.java`): ```java private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException { stream.defaultReadObject(); int elementCount = stream.readInt(); if (elementCount < 0) { throw new InvalidObjectException("Invalid size: " + elementCount); } init(elementCount); for (int i = 0; i < elementCount; i++) { K key = (K) stream.readObject(); V value = (V) stream.readObject(); put(key, value); } } ``` `elementCount` is only checked for being non-negative; there is no upper bound and no relationship enforced between the declared count and how much data actually follows in the stream. `init(elementCount)` (line 251) just stores the value (clamped to `[1, CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE]`, i.e. up to 2^30-1): ```java void init(int expectedSize) { Preconditions.checkArgument(expectedSize >= 0, "Expected size must be >= 0"); this.metadata = Ints.constrainToRange(expectedSize, 1, CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE); } ``` The real allocation is deferred to `allocArrays()`, which fires lazily on the *first* `put()` call — i.e. after only one key/value pair has actually been read off the wire: ```java int allocArrays() { ... int expectedSize = metadata; int buckets = CompactHashing.tableSize(expectedSize); this.table = CompactHashing.createTable(buckets); setHashTableMask(buckets - 1); this.entries = new int[expectedSize]; this.keys = new Object[expectedSize]; this.values = new Object[expectedSize]; return expectedSize; } ``` With `expectedSize` near `CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE` (2^30-1), this single call allocates a hash `table` plus three `expectedSize`-length arrays — multiple gigabytes — triggered by a stream that has, at that point, only supplied one small real element. `CompactHashSet.readObject()`/`allocArrays()` have the identical shape. `CompactLinkedHashMap`/`CompactLinkedHashSet` extend these classes and inherit the same unguarded path. The problem with `MapMakerInternalMap` is similar, with [a size read from the serialized data and stored in a `MapMaker` instance](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L2848-L2851) for [later user during deserialization](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L2897), when [the `MapMaker` is passed back to `MapMakerInternalMap`](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMaker.java#L287) and [segments are allocated](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L173-L200) by [calling `newSegment`](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L1143), whose implementations ([example](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L443)) create `Segment` instances ([example](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L2019)) that [allocate arrays of the requested capacity](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L1234) through [the `newTable`](https://github.com/google/guava/blob/1278ad9c2257f48dc82fb7b7c625ab563605aa24/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/MapMakerInternalMap.java#L1262) helper. This is the same amplification shape as the already-fixed **CVE-2018-10237** (`AtomicDoubleArray`/`CompoundOrdering`: attacker declares a large size, library eagerly allocates before validating against actual stream content). That fix rewrote `AtomicDoubleArray.readObject()` to grow an `ImmutableLongArray.Builder` incrementally per element actually read, rather than pre-allocating from the declared size — Guava's own `HashBiMap.readObject()` documents the same defensive principle explicitly in a comment: `init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap`. `CompactHashMap`/`CompactHashSet` do not follow either of these two patterns already present elsewhere in the same codebase. **Reachability**: All classes are top-level, `implements ... Serializable`, and require no special classpath setup beyond Guava being present (near-ubiquitous on JVM backends). A native Java deserialization attacker names the class directly in a hand-crafted stream — no particular Guava factory method needs to have been used by the victim application, exactly as with the precedent CVE. ## PoC Full source and run instructions in the attached `poc-guava-compacthash-dos.zip` (Maven project, `guava:33.7.1-jre` — the current latest release — as the only dependency). The PoC: 1. Uses reflection only to legitimately obtain a `CompactHashSet` instance (it is package-private; a real attacker does not need this step, since they craft the serialized bytes directly rather than calling Guava's own serialization code). 2. Serializes one set with 1 element and one with 2 elements, diffs the two byte streams to locate the exact offset of the `elementCount` field (byte-precise, not guessed). 3. Patches that one 4-byte field in the 1-element stream from `1` to `0x3FFFFFFF` (`CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE`), leaving the rest of the 72-byte stream (one real `"A"` element) untouched. 4. Feeds the resulting 72-byte malicious stream into a plain `new ObjectInputStream(...).readObject()` call against the real, unmodified `guava-33.7.1-jre.jar`. Actual run output: ``` ### -Xmx8g (generous heap) ### Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1) Malicious stream size: 72 bytes Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion) Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A") === RESULT === Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Time to allocate+fail: 4013 ms Heap used before: 3 MB Heap used after (at failure point): 4103 MB JVM max heap (-Xmx): 8192 MB ### -Xmx128m (ordinary service-sized heap) ### Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1) Malicious stream size: 72 bytes Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion) Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A") === RESULT === Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Time to allocate+fail: 24 ms Heap used before: 4 MB Heap used after (at failure point): 2 MB JVM max heap (-Xmx): 128 MB ``` A 72-byte input forces ~4.1 GB of real allocation before failing on an 8 GB heap, and crashes a 128 MB heap in 24 ms — over 50,000x amplification between input size and forced allocation. To reproduce: `mvn -q compile dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=cp.txt && java -Xmx128m -cp "target/classes:$(cat cp.txt)" poc.Poc` ## Impact Uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-770 / CWE-400) via native Java deserialization: any application that runs `ObjectInputStream.readObject()` on data reachable by an attacker, and has Guava on its classpath (true for a large fraction of the JVM ecosystem), can be crashed with a single ~72-byte payload, regardless of what type the application itself expected to deserialize. ## Severity CVSS 3.1: `AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` — identical vector to CVE-2018-10237, the precedent this is a sibling of. Recomputed with the full formula: exploitability = 8.22×0.85×0.44×0.85×0.85 = 2.221; ISS = 1-(1×1×0.44) = 0.56; impact = 6.42×0.56 = 3.595; base = roundup(5.816) = **5.9 (Medium)**. ## Affected `com.google.guava:guava`, all editions (`-jre`/`-android`) — confirmed on the current latest release, 33.7.1-jre. `CompactHashMap`/`CompactHashSet`/`CompactLinkedHashMap`/`CompactLinkedHashSet` have had this same `readObject`/`allocArrays` shape for a long time (probably since they were added in Guava 23.6), and similarly for `MapMakerInternalMap` (which was introduced in Guava 4.0); not tested against older individual releases. ## Suggested fix Apply the same defense already used elsewhere in this codebase: either clamp the initial `init()` capacity to a small constant regardless of the declared `elementCount` (as `HashBiMap.readObject()` already does — `init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap`) and grow incrementally as elements are actually read, or grow the backing arrays incrementally per iteration of the deserialization loop (as the fixed `AtomicDoubleArray.readObject()` does via `ImmutableLongArray.Builder`) instead of eagerly sizing to the full attacker-declared count on first insert.
Status Published
Exploitability 0.5
Weighted Severity 7.4
Risk 3.7
Affected and Fixed Packages Package Details
Introduced and Fixed Package Commit Patches Package Commit Patches Details
Weaknesses (3)
No exploits are available.

No EPSS data available for this advisory.

Patch URL
There are no known patches.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Found at https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/10/GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94/GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94.json
Attack Vector (AV) Attack Complexity (AC) Privileges Required (PR) User Interaction (UI) Scope (S) Confidentiality Impact (C) Integrity Impact (I) Availability Impact (A)

network

adjacent_network

local

physical

low

high

none

low

high

none

required

unchanged

changed

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N Found at https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/10/GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94/GHSA-xxph-c9ww-hj94.json
Attack Vector (AV) Attack Complexity (AC) Attack Requirements (AT) Privileges Required (PR) User Interaction (UI) Vulnerable System Impact Confidentiality (VC) Vulnerable System Impact Integrity (VI) Vulnerable System Impact Availability (VA) Subsequent System Impact Confidentiality (SC) Subsequent System Impact Integrity (SI) Subsequent System Impact Availability (SA)

network

adjacent

local

physical

low

high

none

present

none

low

high

none

passive

active

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

high

low

none

There are no SSVC decisions available.