{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/117325?format=json","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/httpd24-httpd@2.4.12-6.el7?arch=1","type":"rpm","namespace":"redhat","name":"httpd24-httpd","version":"2.4.12-6.el7","qualifiers":{"arch":"1"},"subpath":"","is_vulnerable":true,"next_non_vulnerable_version":null,"latest_non_vulnerable_version":null,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3759?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-3wuk-hwg1-6fa6","summary":"A design error in the \"ap_some_auth_required\" function renders the API unusuable in httpd 2.4.x. In particular the API is documented to answering if the request required authentication but only answers if there are Require lines in the applicable configuration. Since 2.4.x Require lines are used for authorization as well and can appear in configurations even when no authentication is required and the request is entirely unrestricted. This could lead to modules using this API to allow access when they should otherwise not do so. API users should use the new ap_some_authn_required API added in 2.4.16 instead.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3185.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"3.7","scoring_system":"cvssv3","scoring_elements":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L"}],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3185.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3185","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92802","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92809","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92814","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92812","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92821","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92825","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09491","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92829","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3185"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3183","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3183"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3185","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3185"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243888","reference_id":"1243888","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243888"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-3185.json","reference_id":"CVE-2015-3185","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-3185.json"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1666","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1667","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1667","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1667"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2957","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:2957","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2957"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708","reference_id":"RHSA-2017:2708","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709","reference_id":"RHSA-2017:2709","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2710","reference_id":"RHSA-2017:2710","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2710"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2686-1/","reference_id":"USN-2686-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2686-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2015-3185"],"risk_score":1.6,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"3.3","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-3wuk-hwg1-6fa6"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3756?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-gqat-458a-67g2","summary":"A stack recursion crash in the mod_lua module was found. A Lua script executing the r:wsupgrade() function could crash the process if a malicious client sent a carefully crafted PING request. This issue affected releases 2.4.7 through 2.4.12 inclusive.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-0228.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-0228.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-0228","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95283","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95245","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95257","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9526","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95264","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95272","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95275","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.18715","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9528","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-0228"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0228","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0228"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202988","reference_id":"1202988","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202988"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-0228.json","reference_id":"CVE-2015-0228","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-0228.json"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1666","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2523-1/","reference_id":"USN-2523-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2523-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2015-0228"],"risk_score":1.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"2.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-gqat-458a-67g2"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3758?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-k4kb-21tp-4kc8","summary":"An HTTP request smuggling attack was possible due to a bug in parsing of chunked requests. A malicious client could force the server to misinterpret the request length, allowing cache poisoning or credential hijacking if an intermediary proxy is in use.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3183.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"3.7","scoring_system":"cvssv3","scoring_elements":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L"}],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3183.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3183","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96477","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96485","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96489","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96494","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96502","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96505","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96508","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.28343","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96511","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3183"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3183","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3183"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3185","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3185"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243887","reference_id":"1243887","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243887"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-3183.json","reference_id":"CVE-2015-3183","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-3183.json"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-02","reference_id":"GLSA-201610-02","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-02"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1666","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1667","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1667","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1667"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1668","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1668","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1668"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2661","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:2661","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2661"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0061","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0061","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0061"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0062","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0062","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0062"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2054","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:2054","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2054"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2055","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:2055","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2055"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2056","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:2056","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2056"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2686-1/","reference_id":"USN-2686-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2686-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2015-3183"],"risk_score":1.6,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"3.3","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-k4kb-21tp-4kc8"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3757?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-tcmz-a5dq-d7cj","summary":"A crash in ErrorDocument handling was found. If ErrorDocument 400 was configured pointing to a local URL-path with the INCLUDES filter active, a NULL dereference would occur when handling the error, causing the child process to crash. This issue affected the 2.4.12 release only.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-0253.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-0253.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-0253","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93288","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9326","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93268","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93274","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93272","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93281","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93286","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.1061","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.93289","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-0253"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243891","reference_id":"1243891","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243891"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-0253.json","reference_id":"CVE-2015-0253","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2015-0253.json"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666","reference_id":"RHSA-2015:1666","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1666"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2015-0253"],"risk_score":1.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"2.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-tcmz-a5dq-d7cj"}],"fixing_vulnerabilities":[],"risk_score":"1.6","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:rpm/redhat/httpd24-httpd@2.4.12-6.el7%3Farch=1"}