{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/126225?format=json","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/httpd@2.2.17-15.4.ep5?arch=el5","type":"rpm","namespace":"redhat","name":"httpd","version":"2.2.17-15.4.ep5","qualifiers":{"arch":"el5"},"subpath":"","is_vulnerable":true,"next_non_vulnerable_version":null,"latest_non_vulnerable_version":null,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3732?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-53da-z9gn-n7f2","summary":"A flaw was found in mod_log_config. If the '%{cookiename}C' log format string is in use, a remote attacker could send a specific cookie causing a crash. This crash would only be a denial of service if using a threaded MPM.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0021.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0021.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0021","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9689","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96858","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96866","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96871","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96875","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96884","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96885","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96888","published_at":"2026-04-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.3296","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96889","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0021"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0021","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0021"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785065","reference_id":"785065","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785065"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0021.json","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0021","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0021.json"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/","reference_id":"USN-1368-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2012-0021"],"risk_score":1.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"2.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-53da-z9gn-n7f2"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3730?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-5yez-d5nj-q7eq","summary":"An integer overflow flaw was found which, when the mod_setenvif module is enabled, could allow local users to gain privileges via a .htaccess file.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3607.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3607.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3607","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47455","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47395","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47429","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.4745","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47399","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47454","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47473","published_at":"2026-04-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.00242","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.47448","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3607"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3607","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3607"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769844","reference_id":"769844","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769844"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3607.json","reference_id":"CVE-2011-3607","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3607.json"},{"reference_url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/linux/dos/41769.txt","reference_id":"CVE-2011-4415;CVE-2011-3607","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/linux/dos/41769.txt"},{"reference_url":"http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2011/ApacheModSetEnvIfIntegerOverflow/","reference_id":"CVE-2011-4415;CVE-2011-3607","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2011/ApacheModSetEnvIfIntegerOverflow/"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0128","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0323","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/","reference_id":"USN-1368-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2011-3607"],"risk_score":4.2,"exploitability":"2.0","weighted_severity":"2.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-5yez-d5nj-q7eq"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3728?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-6vze-zk58-7yep","summary":"A flaw was found when mod_proxy_ajp is used together with mod_proxy_balancer. Given a specific configuration, a remote attacker could send certain malformed HTTP requests, putting a backend server into an error state until the retry timeout expired. This could lead to a temporary denial of service.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3348.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3348.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3348","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96969","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9694","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96947","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96952","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96955","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96963","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96964","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96967","published_at":"2026-04-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.34026","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.96968","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3348"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3348","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3348"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736690","reference_id":"736690","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736690"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3348.json","reference_id":"CVE-2011-3348","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"moderate","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3348.json"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1391","reference_id":"RHSA-2011:1391","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1391"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1259-1/","reference_id":"USN-1259-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1259-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2011-3348"],"risk_score":2.4,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"4.8","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-6vze-zk58-7yep"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3734?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-d4rc-pnv5-6uc8","summary":"A flaw was found in the default error response for status code 400. This flaw could be used by an attacker to expose \"httpOnly\" cookies when no custom ErrorDocument is specified.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0053.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0053.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0053","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.98088","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.98081","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.98084","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.981","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.98093","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.55955","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.98099","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0053"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0053","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0053"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785069","reference_id":"785069","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785069"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0053.json","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0053","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"moderate","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0053.json"},{"reference_url":"https://gist.github.com/1955a1c28324d4724b7b/7fe51f2a66c1d4a40a736540b3ad3fde02b7fb08","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0053;OSVDB-78556","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"https://gist.github.com/1955a1c28324d4724b7b/7fe51f2a66c1d4a40a736540b3ad3fde02b7fb08"},{"reference_url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/multiple/remote/18442.html","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0053;OSVDB-78556","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/multiple/remote/18442.html"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0128","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0323","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/","reference_id":"USN-1368-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2012-0053"],"risk_score":9.6,"exploitability":"2.0","weighted_severity":"4.8","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-d4rc-pnv5-6uc8"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3729?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-prd8-51a5-pygj","summary":"An exposure was found when using mod_proxy in reverse proxy mode. In certain configurations using RewriteRule with proxy flag or ProxyPassMatch, a remote attacker could cause the reverse proxy to connect to an arbitrary server, possibly disclosing sensitive information from internal web servers not directly accessible to attacker. No update of 1.3 will be released.\nPatches will be published to https://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_1.3.42/","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3368.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2011-3368.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3368","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99065","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99054","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99055","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99059","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99062","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99063","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.79136","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99064","published_at":"2026-04-11T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2011-3368"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3368","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-3368"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740045","reference_id":"740045","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740045"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3368.json","reference_id":"CVE-2011-3368","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"moderate","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2011-3368.json"},{"reference_url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/multiple/remote/17969.py","reference_id":"CVE-2011-3368;OSVDB-76079","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/multiple/remote/17969.py"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1391","reference_id":"RHSA-2011:1391","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1391"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1392","reference_id":"RHSA-2011:1392","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1392"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1259-1/","reference_id":"USN-1259-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1259-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2011-3368"],"risk_score":9.6,"exploitability":"2.0","weighted_severity":"4.8","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-prd8-51a5-pygj"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/3733?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-ym93-sxb8-fkdm","summary":"A flaw was found in the handling of the scoreboard. An unprivileged child process could cause the parent process to crash at shutdown rather than terminate cleanly.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0031.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2012-0031.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0031","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78884","published_at":"2026-04-13T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78837","published_at":"2026-04-01T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78843","published_at":"2026-04-02T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78872","published_at":"2026-04-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78854","published_at":"2026-04-07T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78879","published_at":"2026-04-08T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78886","published_at":"2026-04-09T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78909","published_at":"2026-04-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01196","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.78893","published_at":"2026-04-12T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2012-0031"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0031","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0031"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773744","reference_id":"773744","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773744"},{"reference_url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/linux/dos/41768.txt","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0031","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb/-/blob/main/exploits/linux/dos/41768.txt"},{"reference_url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0031.json","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0031","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"low","scoring_system":"apache_httpd","scoring_elements":""}],"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/json/CVE-2012-0031.json"},{"reference_url":"http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2011/ApacheScoreboardInvalidFreeOnShutdown/","reference_id":"CVE-2012-0031","reference_type":"exploit","scores":[],"url":"http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2011/ApacheScoreboardInvalidFreeOnShutdown/"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25","reference_id":"GLSA-201206-25","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-25"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0128","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0128"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0323","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0323"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0542","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0542"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543","reference_id":"RHSA-2012:0543","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0543"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/","reference_id":"USN-1368-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/1368-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2012-0031"],"risk_score":4.2,"exploitability":"2.0","weighted_severity":"2.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-ym93-sxb8-fkdm"}],"fixing_vulnerabilities":[],"risk_score":"9.6","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:rpm/redhat/httpd@2.2.17-15.4.ep5%3Farch=el5"}