{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","type":"ebuild","namespace":"net-fs","name":"samba","version":"4.2.11","qualifiers":{},"subpath":"","is_vulnerable":false,"next_non_vulnerable_version":"4.5.16","latest_non_vulnerable_version":"4.18.9","affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"fixing_vulnerabilities":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100665?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-4pjr-6tfv-hqgu","summary":"The LDAP server in the AD domain controller in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22 does not check return values to ensure successful ASN.1 memory allocation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and daemon crash) via crafted packets.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-7540.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-7540.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.39597","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.97384","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.39597","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.9739","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288451","reference_id":"1288451","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288451"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0010","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0015","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-7540"],"risk_score":0.2,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.4","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-4pjr-6tfv-hqgu"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/75219?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-68mw-cr8k-qfgs","summary":"ldb before 1.1.24, as used in the AD LDAP server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, mishandles string lengths, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from daemon heap memory by sending crafted packets and then reading (1) an error message or (2) a database value.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5330.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5330.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.01625","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.82196","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01625","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.82225","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"4","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281326","reference_id":"1281326","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281326"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0006","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0009","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0009","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0009"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0010","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0014","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0014","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0014"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0015","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0016","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2856-1/","reference_id":"USN-2856-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2856-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-5330"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-68mw-cr8k-qfgs"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100675?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-8tyg-f73c-zuh3","summary":"Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not require SMB signing within a DCERPC session over ncacn_np, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB clients by modifying the client-server data stream.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2115.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2115.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.22744","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95973","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.22744","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95977","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"6.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312084","reference_id":"1312084","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312084"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0611","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0613","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0619","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0624","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2115"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.2","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-8tyg-f73c-zuh3"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100663?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-c99r-m2v5-zqa3","summary":"The shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data function in modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not verify that the DIRECTORY_LIST access right has been granted, which allows remote attackers to access snapshots by visiting a shadow copy directory.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5299.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5299.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.09138","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92829","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.09138","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.92841","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"3.5","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276126","reference_id":"1276126","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276126"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0006","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0010","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0011","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0015","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0016","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-5299"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-c99r-m2v5-zqa3"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100670?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-eaxm-5jgj-eqcg","summary":"The NETLOGON service in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2, when a domain controller is configured, allows remote attackers to spoof the computer name of a secure channel's endpoint, and obtain sensitive session information, by running a crafted application and leveraging the ability to sniff network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2015-0005.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2111.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2111.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.02808","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.864","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.02808","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.86423","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"4.3","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311902","reference_id":"1311902","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311902"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0611","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0613","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0619","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0621","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0623","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0624","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0625","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2111"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-eaxm-5jgj-eqcg"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100676?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-egeg-4ds7-d3d1","summary":"The MS-SAMR and MS-LSAD protocol implementations in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 mishandle DCERPC connections, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks and impersonate users by modifying the client-server data stream, aka \"BADLOCK.\"","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2118.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2118.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.78522","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.99061","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"6.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317990","reference_id":"1317990","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317990"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0611","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0613","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0619","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0621","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0623","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0624","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0625","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2118"],"risk_score":0.3,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.7","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-egeg-4ds7-d3d1"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100672?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-enbr-g8ae-ubbc","summary":"Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof LDAPS and HTTPS servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2113.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2113.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.04197","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.88919","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.04197","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.88936","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"4.3","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311910","reference_id":"1311910","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311910"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2113"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-enbr-g8ae-ubbc"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100673?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-p4mk-1t9q-sbb3","summary":"The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the \"server signing = mandatory\" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2114.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2114.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.05863","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.90727","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.05863","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.90739","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"5.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312082","reference_id":"1312082","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312082"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2114"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-p4mk-1t9q-sbb3"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100667?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-sdjf-rkjd-sudg","summary":"The samldb_check_user_account_control_acl function in dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not properly check for administrative privileges during creation of machine accounts, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the existence of a domain with both a Samba DC and a Windows DC, a similar issue to CVE-2015-2535.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-8467.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-8467.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.01714","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.82702","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01714","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.82728","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290294","reference_id":"1290294","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290294"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-8467"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-sdjf-rkjd-sudg"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/75218?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-tyhs-5xjv-c7b5","summary":"The ldb_wildcard_compare function in ldb_match.c in ldb before 1.1.24, as used in the AD LDAP server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, mishandles certain zero values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via crafted packets.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3223.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-3223.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.20255","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95629","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.20255","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95635","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"7.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290287","reference_id":"1290287","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290287"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0009","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0009","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0009"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0014","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0014","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0014"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2856-1/","reference_id":"USN-2856-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2856-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-3223"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.2","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-tyhs-5xjv-c7b5"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100669?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-vtne-we7s-tuet","summary":"The NTLMSSP authentication implementation in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream to remove application-layer flags or encryption settings, as demonstrated by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL or NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN option to disrupt LDAP security.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2110.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2110.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.17748","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95244","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.17748","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95252","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"5.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311893","reference_id":"1311893","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311893"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0611","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0613","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0619","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0621","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0621"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0623","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0623"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0624","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0625","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0625"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2110"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.2","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-vtne-we7s-tuet"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100661?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-x55t-cux2-q3gw","summary":"vfs.c in smbd in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, when share names with certain substring relationships exist, allows remote attackers to bypass intended file-access restrictions via a symlink that points outside of a share.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5252.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5252.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.17333","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95169","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.17333","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95177","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"6.8","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290288","reference_id":"1290288","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290288"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0006","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0010","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0011","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0015","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0016","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-5252"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.2","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-x55t-cux2-q3gw"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100671?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-yt92-mfwy-z7er","summary":"The bundled LDAP client library in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the \"client ldap sasl wrapping\" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform LDAP protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2112.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2016-2112.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.16609","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95043","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.16609","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.95051","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5370"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2110"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2111"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2112"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2113"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2114"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2115"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-2118"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"4.3","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311903","reference_id":"1311903","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311903"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0611","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0611"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0612","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0612"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0613","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0613"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0614","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0614"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0618","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0618"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0619","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0619"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0620","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0620"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0624","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0624"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/","reference_id":"USN-2950-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2950-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2016-2112"],"risk_score":0.1,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.1","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-yt92-mfwy-z7er"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/100662?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-zfyb-9wrs-eyfx","summary":"Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 supports connections that are encrypted but unsigned, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct encrypted-to-unencrypted downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream, related to clidfs.c, libsmb_server.c, and smbXcli_base.c.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5296.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2015-5296.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.03652","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.88073","published_at":"2026-06-04T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.03652","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.88094","published_at":"2026-06-05T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3223"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5252"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5296"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5299"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-5330"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7540"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-8467"},{"reference_url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"3.2","scoring_system":"cvssv2","scoring_elements":"AV:A/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N"}],"url":"https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/yaml/suse-cvss-scores.yaml"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290292","reference_id":"1290292","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290292"},{"reference_url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47","reference_id":"GLSA-201612-47","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0006","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0006"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0010","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0010"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0011","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0011"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0015","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0015"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016","reference_id":"RHSA-2016:0016","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0016"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/","reference_id":"USN-2855-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/2855-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/193495?format=json","purl":"pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11","is_vulnerable":false,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[],"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}],"aliases":["CVE-2015-5296"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-zfyb-9wrs-eyfx"}],"risk_score":null,"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:ebuild/net-fs/samba@4.2.11"}