{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/packages/369377?format=json","purl":"pkg:rpm/redhat/evolution-data-server@1.12.3-10.el5_3?arch=3","type":"rpm","namespace":"redhat","name":"evolution-data-server","version":"1.12.3-10.el5_3","qualifiers":{"arch":"3"},"subpath":"","is_vulnerable":true,"next_non_vulnerable_version":null,"latest_non_vulnerable_version":null,"affected_by_vulnerabilities":[{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/201374?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-e4xa-phk6-7ugb","summary":"The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a certain length value is consistent with the amount of data in a challenge packet, which allows remote mail servers to read information from the process memory of a client, or cause a denial of service (client crash), via an NTLM authentication type 2 packet with a length value that exceeds the amount of packet data.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0582.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0582.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0582","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.03432","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.87743","published_at":"2026-06-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.03432","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.87785","published_at":"2026-06-12T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.03432","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.87791","published_at":"2026-06-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0582"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0582","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0582"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487685","reference_id":"487685","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487685"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0354","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0355","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0358","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0358","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0358"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2009-0582"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-e4xa-phk6-7ugb"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/201376?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-jn6d-sq5u-vqax","summary":"Multiple integer overflows in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) before 2.24.5 allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string that is converted to a base64 representation in (1) addressbook/libebook/e-vcard.c in evc or (2) camel/camel-mime-utils.c in libcamel.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0587.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0587.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0587","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.01885","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.83574","published_at":"2026-06-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01885","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.83634","published_at":"2026-06-12T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.01885","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.83643","published_at":"2026-06-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0587"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0587","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0587"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488226","reference_id":"488226","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488226"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0354","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0355","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0358","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0358","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0358"},{"reference_url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/733-1/","reference_id":"USN-733-1","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/733-1/"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2009-0587"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-jn6d-sq5u-vqax"},{"url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/api/vulnerabilities/201369?format=json","vulnerability_id":"VCID-w3r7-4cec-2fc4","summary":"Evolution 2.22.3.1 checks S/MIME signatures against a copy of the e-mail text within a signed-data blob, not the copy of the e-mail text displayed to the user, which allows remote attackers to spoof a signature by modifying the latter copy, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5077.","references":[{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0547.json","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/hydra/rest/securitydata/cve/CVE-2009-0547.json"},{"reference_url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0547","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[{"value":"0.04247","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.89035","published_at":"2026-06-11T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.04247","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.89073","published_at":"2026-06-12T12:55:00Z"},{"value":"0.04247","scoring_system":"epss","scoring_elements":"0.89081","published_at":"2026-06-13T12:55:00Z"}],"url":"https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2009-0547"},{"reference_url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0547","reference_id":"","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0547"},{"reference_url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484925","reference_id":"484925","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484925"},{"reference_url":"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508479","reference_id":"508479","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508479"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0354","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0354"},{"reference_url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355","reference_id":"RHSA-2009:0355","reference_type":"","scores":[],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0355"}],"fixed_packages":[],"aliases":["CVE-2009-0547"],"risk_score":null,"exploitability":"0.5","weighted_severity":"0.0","resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-w3r7-4cec-2fc4"}],"fixing_vulnerabilities":[],"risk_score":null,"resource_url":"http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/packages/pkg:rpm/redhat/evolution-data-server@1.12.3-10.el5_3%3Farch=3"}