Search for packages
purl | pkg:cargo/openssl-src@300.0.4%2B3.0.1 |
Next non-vulnerable version | 300.0.12+3.0.8 |
Latest non-vulnerable version | 300.0.12+3.0.8 |
Risk | 10.0 |
Vulnerability | Summary | Fixed by |
---|---|---|
VCID-4dq2-tex3-aaac
Aliases: CVE-2022-3358 GHSA-4f63-89w9-3jjv VC-OPENSSL-20220929-CVE-2022-3358 |
OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers. OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the ciphertext. Applications are only affected by this issue if they call EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.6 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-5khv-27u8-aaaa
Aliases: CVE-2022-2097 GHSA-3wx7-46ch-7rq2 VC-OPENSSL-20220705-CVE-2022-2097 |
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 12 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-64cj-3d84-aaaa
Aliases: CVE-2023-0216 GHSA-29xx-hcv2-c4cp |
An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-6pjh-cgdt-aaaj
Aliases: CVE-2022-0778 GHSA-x3mh-jvjw-3xwx VC-OPENSSL-20220315-CVE-2022-0778 |
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-7z6x-p6yd-aaaa
Aliases: CVE-2022-3602 GHSA-8rwr-x37p-mx23 VC-OPENSSL-20221101-CVE-2022-3602 |
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-9wtx-9sbn-aaam
Aliases: CVE-2023-0286 GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 |
Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-bgkw-96dy-aaas
Aliases: CVE-2023-0217 GHSA-vxrh-cpg7-8vjr |
An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-bk4y-1rgt-aaae
Aliases: CVE-2022-1473 GHSA-g323-fr93-4j3c VC-OPENSSL-20220503-CVE-2022-1473 |
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-ec3y-aejm-aaad
Aliases: CVE-2022-4450 GHSA-v5w6-wcm8-jm4q |
The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-f4yg-z94s-aaak
Aliases: CVE-2022-3996 GHSA-vr8j-hgmm-jh9r |
If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this results in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy processing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered to be a common setup. Policy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. Update (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement was corrected based on CVE-2023-0466. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-fbrd-5tm8-aaag
Aliases: CVE-2022-1343 GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7 VC-OPENSSL-20220503-CVE-2022-1343 |
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-fmkg-h222-aaac
Aliases: CVE-2022-4203 GHSA-w67w-mw4j-8qrv |
A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-jhyx-3a27-aaae
Aliases: CVE-2022-3786 GHSA-h8jm-2x53-xhp5 VC-OPENSSL-20221101-CVE-2022-3786 |
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-kxc1-w2u3-aaak
Aliases: CVE-2023-0401 GHSA-vrh7-x64v-7vxq |
A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-txnr-sbnm-aaag
Aliases: CVE-2022-1434 GHSA-638m-m8mh-7gw2 VC-OPENSSL-20220503-CVE-2022-1434 |
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-ur7f-5ey8-aaak
Aliases: CVE-2022-4304 GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 |
A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
VCID-uua4-ygek-aaah
Aliases: CVE-2023-0215 GHSA-r7jw-wp68-3xch |
The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected. |
Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. |
Vulnerability | Summary | Aliases |
---|---|---|
VCID-5h1a-3hkg-aaag | Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). |
CVE-2021-4044
GHSA-mmjf-f5jw-w72q VC-OPENSSL-20211214-CVE-2021-4044 |
Date | Actor | Action | Vulnerability | Source | VulnerableCode Version |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-10-07T21:05:24.692354+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-kxc1-w2u3-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vrh7-x64v-7vxq | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T21:05:18.706497+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-9wtx-9sbn-aaam | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T21:05:15.652113+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-bgkw-96dy-aaas | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vxrh-cpg7-8vjr | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T21:05:15.332833+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-64cj-3d84-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-29xx-hcv2-c4cp | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T21:05:14.622220+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-uua4-ygek-aaah | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r7jw-wp68-3xch | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:56:43.849952+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-ec3y-aejm-aaad | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v5w6-wcm8-jm4q | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:56:14.879105+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-ur7f-5ey8-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:55:57.179046+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-fmkg-h222-aaac | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w67w-mw4j-8qrv | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:52:49.658069+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-f4yg-z94s-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vr8j-hgmm-jh9r | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:51:17.564428+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-jhyx-3a27-aaae | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h8jm-2x53-xhp5 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:42:32.232844+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-7z6x-p6yd-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8rwr-x37p-mx23 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:37:43.903010+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-4dq2-tex3-aaac | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4f63-89w9-3jjv | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T20:04:40.419902+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-5khv-27u8-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3wx7-46ch-7rq2 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T19:56:53.984184+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-bk4y-1rgt-aaae | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g323-fr93-4j3c | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T19:56:49.981335+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-txnr-sbnm-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-638m-m8mh-7gw2 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T19:56:43.516366+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-fbrd-5tm8-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7 | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T19:55:57.312743+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-6pjh-cgdt-aaaj | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x3mh-jvjw-3xwx | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-07T19:47:57.990316+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Fixing | VCID-5h1a-3hkg-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mmjf-f5jw-w72q | 34.0.2 |
2024-10-06T22:33:26.343997+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-f4yg-z94s-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vr8j-hgmm-jh9r | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:35:23.413021+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-kxc1-w2u3-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vrh7-x64v-7vxq | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:35:16.976059+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-9wtx-9sbn-aaam | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:35:14.158623+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-bgkw-96dy-aaas | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vxrh-cpg7-8vjr | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:35:13.912770+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-64cj-3d84-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-29xx-hcv2-c4cp | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:35:13.066364+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-uua4-ygek-aaah | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r7jw-wp68-3xch | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:33:53.157661+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-ec3y-aejm-aaad | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v5w6-wcm8-jm4q | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:33:25.027838+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-ur7f-5ey8-aaak | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:33:06.662480+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-fmkg-h222-aaac | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w67w-mw4j-8qrv | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:28:38.902567+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-jhyx-3a27-aaae | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h8jm-2x53-xhp5 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:21:22.546358+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-7z6x-p6yd-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8rwr-x37p-mx23 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T21:17:11.136539+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-4dq2-tex3-aaac | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4f63-89w9-3jjv | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:43:14.919918+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-5khv-27u8-aaaa | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3wx7-46ch-7rq2 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:42:47.013931+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-bk4y-1rgt-aaae | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g323-fr93-4j3c | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:42:42.342885+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-txnr-sbnm-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-638m-m8mh-7gw2 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:42:35.767590+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-fbrd-5tm8-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7 | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:41:47.009262+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Affected by | VCID-6pjh-cgdt-aaaj | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x3mh-jvjw-3xwx | 34.0.1 |
2024-09-22T20:28:33.294961+00:00 | GHSA Importer | Fixing | VCID-5h1a-3hkg-aaag | https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mmjf-f5jw-w72q | 34.0.1 |