VulnerableCode Package Details - pkg:openssl/openssl@1.0.2

Vulnerabilities affecting this package (74)

Vulnerability	Summary	Fixed by
VCID-1gxv-1j1x-aaag Aliases: CVE-2019-1547 VC-OPENSSL-20190910-CVE-2019-1547	Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).	1.0.2t Affected by 11 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0l Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. 1.1.1d Affected by 13 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-1pke-t171-aaas Aliases: CVE-2015-0287 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0287	ASN.1 structure reuse memory corruption. Reusing a structure in ASN.1 parsing may allow an attacker to cause memory corruption via an invalid write. Such reuse is and has been strongly discouraged and is believed to be rare.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-1t6y-1zjy-aaae Aliases: CVE-2016-0704 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0704	This issue only affected versions of OpenSSL prior to March 19th 2015 at which time the code was refactored to address the vulnerability CVE-2015-0293. s2_srvr.c overwrite the wrong bytes in the master-key when applying Bleichenbacher protection for export cipher suites. This provides a Bleichenbacher oracle, and could potentially allow more efficient variants of the DROWN attack.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-3d3c-x2ux-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2015-3195 VC-OPENSSL-20151203-CVE-2015-3195	When presented with a malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE structure OpenSSL will leak memory. This structure is used by the PKCS#7 and CMS routines so any application which reads PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources is affected. SSL/TLS is not affected.	1.0.2e Affected by 50 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-42tc-p92q-aaap Aliases: CVE-2016-2105 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2105	Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data.	1.0.2h Affected by 37 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-4hq6-j84v-aaan Aliases: CVE-2017-3738 VC-OPENSSL-20171207-CVE-2017-3738	There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository.	1.0.2n Affected by 19 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0h Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-52ea-drta-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2016-2108 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2108	This issue affected versions of OpenSSL prior to April 2015. The bug causing the vulnerability was fixed on April 18th 2015, and released as part of the June 11th 2015 security releases. The security impact of the bug was not known at the time. In previous versions of OpenSSL, ASN.1 encoding the value zero represented as a negative integer can cause a buffer underflow with an out-of-bounds write in i2c_ASN1_INTEGER. The ASN.1 parser does not normally create "negative zeroes" when parsing ASN.1 input, and therefore, an attacker cannot trigger this bug. However, a second, independent bug revealed that the ASN.1 parser (specifically, d2i_ASN1_TYPE) can misinterpret a large universal tag as a negative zero value. Large universal tags are not present in any common ASN.1 structures (such as X509) but are accepted as part of ANY structures. Therefore, if an application deserializes untrusted ASN.1 structures containing an ANY field, and later reserializes them, an attacker may be able to trigger an out-of-bounds write. This has been shown to cause memory corruption that is potentially exploitable with some malloc implementations. Applications that parse and re-encode X509 certificates are known to be vulnerable. Applications that verify RSA signatures on X509 certificates may also be vulnerable; however, only certificates with valid signatures trigger ASN.1 re-encoding and hence the bug. Specifically, since OpenSSL's default TLS X509 chain verification code verifies the certificate chain from root to leaf, TLS handshakes could only be targeted with valid certificates issued by trusted Certification Authorities.	1.0.2c Affected by 56 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-581z-anfk-aaaq Aliases: CVE-2016-6302 VC-OPENSSL-20160823-CVE-2016-6302	The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-68v4-qbae-aaak Aliases: CVE-2015-3197 VC-OPENSSL-20160128-CVE-2015-3197	A malicious client can negotiate SSLv2 ciphers that have been disabled on the server and complete SSLv2 handshakes even if all SSLv2 ciphers have been disabled, provided that the SSLv2 protocol was not also disabled via SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2.	1.0.2f Affected by 48 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-69ax-cbdq-aaam Aliases: CVE-2015-1791 VC-OPENSSL-20150602-CVE-2015-1791	If a NewSessionTicket is received by a multi-threaded client when attempting to reuse a previous ticket then a race condition can occur potentially leading to a double free of the ticket data.	1.0.2b Affected by 57 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-6pjh-cgdt-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2022-0778 GHSA-x3mh-jvjw-3xwx VC-OPENSSL-20220315-CVE-2022-0778	The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).	1.0.2zd Affected by 2 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1n Affected by 3 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 3.0.2 Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-75pz-sunt-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2015-0209 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0209	Use After Free following d2i_ECPrivatekey error. A malformed EC private key file consumed via the d2i_ECPrivateKey function could cause a use after free condition. This, in turn, could cause a double free in several private key parsing functions (such as d2i_PrivateKey or EVP_PKCS82PKEY) and could lead to a DoS attack or memory corruption for applications that receive EC private keys from untrusted sources. This scenario is considered rare.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-914k-6fj2-aaac Aliases: CVE-2015-0286 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0286	Segmentation fault in ASN1_TYPE_cmp. The function ASN1_TYPE_cmp will crash with an invalid read if an attempt is made to compare ASN.1 boolean types. Since ASN1_TYPE_cmp is used to check certificate signature algorithm consistency this can be used to crash any certificate verification operation and exploited in a DoS attack. Any application which performs certificate verification is vulnerable including OpenSSL clients and servers which enable client authentication.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-9cyz-en38-aaad Aliases: CVE-2018-0732 VC-OPENSSL-20180612-CVE-2018-0732	During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o).	1.0.2p Affected by 16 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0i Affected by 6 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-9few-spp9-aaag Aliases: CVE-2015-0293 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0293	DoS via reachable assert in SSLv2 servers. A malicious client can trigger an OPENSSL_assert in servers that both support SSLv2 and enable export cipher suites by sending a specially crafted SSLv2 CLIENT-MASTER-KEY message.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-9fjn-9378-aaae Aliases: CVE-2016-2179 VC-OPENSSL-20160822-CVE-2016-2179	The DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries associated with unused out-of-order messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by maintaining many crafted DTLS sessions simultaneously, related to d1_lib.c, statem_dtls.c, statem_lib.c, and statem_srvr.c.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-9ruy-372r-aaas Aliases: CVE-2021-23841 GHSA-84rm-qf37-fgc2 VC-OPENSSL-20210216-CVE-2021-23841	The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).	1.0.2y Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1j Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-9wtw-93e9-aaam Aliases: CVE-2016-0799 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0799	The internal \|fmtstr\| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal \|doapr_outch\| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-a12s-yyr4-aaad Aliases: CVE-2016-2181 VC-OPENSSL-20160819-CVE-2016-2181	The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-agz8-77e4-aaaq Aliases: CVE-2016-2182 VC-OPENSSL-20160816-CVE-2016-2182	The BN_bn2dec function in crypto/bn/bn_print.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly validate division results, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-arc3-rhts-aaar Aliases: CVE-2015-1792 VC-OPENSSL-20150611-CVE-2015-1792	When verifying a signedData message the CMS code can enter an infinite loop if presented with an unknown hash function OID. This can be used to perform denial of service against any system which verifies signedData messages using the CMS code.	1.0.2b Affected by 57 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-b72e-m1ek-aaar Aliases: CVE-2015-0285 VC-OPENSSL-20150310-CVE-2015-0285	Under certain conditions an OpenSSL 1.0.2 client can complete a handshake with an unseeded PRNG. If the handshake succeeds then the client random that has been used will have been generated from a PRNG with insufficient entropy and therefore the output may be predictable.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-bms1-jrax-aaap Aliases: CVE-2016-6304 VC-OPENSSL-20160922-CVE-2016-6304	Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0a Affected by 22 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-bsap-s527-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2015-0289 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0289	PKCS#7 NULL pointer dereference. The PKCS#7 parsing code does not handle missing outer ContentInfo correctly. An attacker can craft malformed ASN.1-encoded PKCS#7 blobs with missing content and trigger a NULL pointer dereference on parsing. Applications that verify PKCS#7 signatures, decrypt PKCS#7 data or otherwise parse PKCS#7 structures from untrusted sources are affected. OpenSSL clients and servers are not affected.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-cc4a-98u2-aaam Aliases: CVE-2015-1787 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-1787	Empty CKE with client auth and DHE. If client auth is used then a server can seg fault in the event of a DHE ciphersuite being selected and a zero length ClientKeyExchange message being sent by the client. This could be exploited in a DoS attack.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ceua-4xhz-aaag Aliases: CVE-2018-5407 VC-OPENSSL-20181102-CVE-2018-5407	Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.	1.0.2q Affected by 14 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0i Affected by 6 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-cg17-ah7e-aaag Aliases: CVE-2016-2107 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2107	The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169.	1.0.2h Affected by 37 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-chu6-e54e-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2021-23839 VC-OPENSSL-20210216-CVE-2021-23839	OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x).	1.0.2y Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-eg7n-8h8z-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2016-6306 VC-OPENSSL-20160921-CVE-2016-6306	The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-egbc-ecck-aaag Aliases: CVE-2016-2109 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2109	The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in the ASN.1 BIO implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a short invalid encoding.	1.0.2h Affected by 37 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ejg3-awxf-aaan Aliases: CVE-2016-0705 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0705	A double free bug was discovered when OpenSSL parses malformed DSA private keys and could lead to a DoS attack or memory corruption for applications that receive DSA private keys from untrusted sources. This scenario is considered rare.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ftte-av19-aaad Aliases: CVE-2016-0703 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0703	This issue only affected versions of OpenSSL prior to March 19th 2015 at which time the code was refactored to address vulnerability CVE-2015-0293. s2_srvr.c did not enforce that clear-key-length is 0 for non-export ciphers. If clear-key bytes are present for these ciphers, they displace encrypted-key bytes. This leads to an efficient divide-and-conquer key recovery attack: if an eavesdropper has intercepted an SSLv2 handshake, they can use the server as an oracle to determine the SSLv2 master-key, using only 16 connections to the server and negligible computation. More importantly, this leads to a more efficient version of DROWN that is effective against non-export ciphersuites, and requires no significant computation.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ghgs-7167-aaag Aliases: CVE-2021-3712 GHSA-q9wj-f4qw-6vfj VC-OPENSSL-20210824-CVE-2021-3712	ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).	1.0.2za Affected by 4 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1l Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-gp3a-7m39-aaam Aliases: CVE-2015-3194 VC-OPENSSL-20151203-CVE-2015-3194	The signature verification routines will crash with a NULL pointer dereference if presented with an ASN.1 signature using the RSA PSS algorithm and absent mask generation function parameter. Since these routines are used to verify certificate signature algorithms this can be used to crash any certificate verification operation and exploited in a DoS attack. Any application which performs certificate verification is vulnerable including OpenSSL clients and servers which enable client authentication.	1.0.2e Affected by 50 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-gydy-46kx-aaaf Aliases: CVE-2015-1789 VC-OPENSSL-20150611-CVE-2015-1789	X509_cmp_time does not properly check the length of the ASN1_TIME string and can read a few bytes out of bounds. In addition, X509_cmp_time accepts an arbitrary number of fractional seconds in the time string. An attacker can use this to craft malformed certificates and CRLs of various sizes and potentially cause a segmentation fault, resulting in a DoS on applications that verify certificates or CRLs. TLS clients that verify CRLs are affected. TLS clients and servers with client authentication enabled may be affected if they use custom verification callbacks.	1.0.2b Affected by 57 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-hzh3-5uc4-aaap Aliases: CVE-2015-3196 VC-OPENSSL-20151203-CVE-2015-3196	If PSK identity hints are received by a multi-threaded client then the values are wrongly updated in the parent SSL_CTX structure. This can result in a race condition potentially leading to a double free of the identify hint data.	1.0.2d Affected by 54 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-j8pb-xdpc-aaap Aliases: CVE-2018-0737 VC-OPENSSL-20180416-CVE-2018-0737	The OpenSSL RSA Key generation algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a cache timing side channel attack. An attacker with sufficient access to mount cache timing attacks during the RSA key generation process could recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2o).	1.0.2p Affected by 16 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0i Affected by 6 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-jhg8-wbm2-aaas Aliases: CVE-2017-3735 VC-OPENSSL-20170828-CVE-2017-3735	While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.	1.0.2m Affected by 21 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0g Affected by 12 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-kryh-pfgh-aaag Aliases: CVE-2016-2177 VC-OPENSSL-20160601-CVE-2016-2177	OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-m2aa-mh5n-aaae Aliases: CVE-2015-0207 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0207	Segmentation fault in DTLSv1_listen. A defect in the implementation of DTLSv1_listen means that state is preserved in the SSL object from one invocation to the next that can lead to a segmentation fault. Errors processing the initial ClientHello can trigger this scenario. An example of such an error could be that a DTLS1.0 only client is attempting to connect to a DTLS1.2 only server.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-m4nz-uw2e-aaaq Aliases: CVE-2016-0798 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0798	The SRP user database lookup method SRP_VBASE_get_by_user had confusing memory management semantics; the returned pointer was sometimes newly allocated, and sometimes owned by the callee. The calling code has no way of distinguishing these two cases. Specifically, SRP servers that configure a secret seed to hide valid login information are vulnerable to a memory leak: an attacker connecting with an invalid username can cause a memory leak of around 300 bytes per connection. Servers that do not configure SRP, or configure SRP but do not configure a seed are not vulnerable. In Apache, the seed directive is known as SSLSRPUnknownUserSeed. To mitigate the memory leak, the seed handling in SRP_VBASE_get_by_user is now disabled even if the user has configured a seed. Applications are advised to migrate to SRP_VBASE_get1_by_user. However, note that OpenSSL makes no strong guarantees about the indistinguishability of valid and invalid logins. In particular, computations are currently not carried out in constant time.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-msmt-6x6r-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2020-1968 VC-OPENSSL-20200909-CVE-2020-1968	The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have used a Diffie-Hellman (DH) based ciphersuite. In such a case this would result in the attacker being able to eavesdrop on all encrypted communications sent over that TLS connection. The attack can only be exploited if an implementation re-uses a DH secret across multiple TLS connections. Note that this issue only impacts DH ciphersuites and not ECDH ciphersuites. This issue affects OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable to this issue.	1.0.2w Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-nx9u-49dk-aaag Aliases: CVE-2020-1971 VC-OPENSSL-20201208-CVE-2020-1971		1.0.2x Affected by 8 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1i Affected by 11 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-psvb-thr2-aaap Aliases: CVE-2018-0734 VC-OPENSSL-20181030-CVE-2018-0734	The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).	1.0.2q Affected by 14 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0j Affected by 4 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1a Affected by 17 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-pzng-q94v-aaah Aliases: CVE-2019-1552 VC-OPENSSL-20190730-CVE-2019-1552	OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory is most commonly referred to as OPENSSLDIR, and is configurable with the --prefix / --openssldir configuration options. For OpenSSL versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the mingw configuration targets assume that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default prefix for program installation as well as for OPENSSLDIR should be '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are Windows programs, and as such, find themselves looking at sub-directories of 'C:/usr/local', which may be world writable, which enables untrusted users to modify OpenSSL's default configuration, insert CA certificates, modify (or even replace) existing engine modules, etc. For OpenSSL 1.0.2, '/usr/local/ssl' is used as default for OPENSSLDIR on all Unix and Windows targets, including Visual C builds. However, some build instructions for the diverse Windows targets on 1.0.2 encourage you to specify your own --prefix. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1, 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time.	1.0.2t Affected by 11 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0l Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. 1.1.1d Affected by 13 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-q9r2-dz2p-aaap Aliases: CVE-2019-1563 VC-OPENSSL-20190910-CVE-2019-1563	In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).	1.0.2t Affected by 11 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0l Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. 1.1.1d Affected by 13 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-qbz3-r843-aaaf Aliases: CVE-2016-2183 VC-OPENSSL-20160824-CVE-2016-2183	The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-qkh6-sakf-aaar Aliases: CVE-2017-3732 VC-OPENSSL-20170126-CVE-2017-3732	There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.	1.0.2k Affected by 23 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0d Affected by 15 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-qtbw-vpbp-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2021-4160 VC-OPENSSL-20220128-CVE-2021-4160	There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms.	1.0.2zc Affected by 3 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.0.2zc-de Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. 1.1.1m Affected by 4 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 3.0.1 Affected by 10 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-rhab-a2ya-aaae Aliases: CVE-2015-1788 VC-OPENSSL-20150611-CVE-2015-1788	When processing an ECParameters structure OpenSSL enters an infinite loop if the curve specified is over a specially malformed binary polynomial field. This can be used to perform denial of service against any system which processes public keys, certificate requests or certificates. This includes TLS clients and TLS servers with client authentication enabled.	1.0.2b Affected by 57 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-s4w8-efdq-aaac Aliases: CVE-2015-0291 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0291	ClientHello sigalgs DoS. If a client connects to an OpenSSL 1.0.2 server and renegotiates with an invalid signature algorithms extension a NULL pointer dereference will occur. This can be exploited in a DoS attack against the server.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-sgbg-ntsk-aaac Aliases: CVE-2016-6303 VC-OPENSSL-20160824-CVE-2016-6303	Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-t9zu-eqq1-aaag Aliases: CVE-2016-0702 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0702	A side-channel attack was found which makes use of cache-bank conflicts on the Intel Sandy-Bridge microarchitecture which could lead to the recovery of RSA keys. The ability to exploit this issue is limited as it relies on an attacker who has control of code in a thread running on the same hyper-threaded core as the victim thread which is performing decryptions.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-tc8g-det5-aaad Aliases: CVE-2015-1790 VC-OPENSSL-20150611-CVE-2015-1790	The PKCS#7 parsing code does not handle missing inner EncryptedContent correctly. An attacker can craft malformed ASN.1-encoded PKCS#7 blobs with missing content and trigger a NULL pointer dereference on parsing. Applications that decrypt PKCS#7 data or otherwise parse PKCS#7 structures from untrusted sources are affected. OpenSSL clients and servers are not affected.	1.0.2b Affected by 57 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ue1t-xset-aaah Aliases: CVE-2016-2180 VC-OPENSSL-20160722-CVE-2016-2180	The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted time-stamp file that is mishandled by the "openssl ts" command.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-uh6s-bvxe-aaaf Aliases: CVE-2016-0797 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0797	In the BN_hex2bn function the number of hex digits is calculated using an int value \|i\|. Later \|bn_expand\| is called with a value of \|i * 4\|. For large values of \|i\| this can result in \|bn_expand\| not allocating any memory because \|i * 4\| is negative. This can leave the internal BIGNUM data field as NULL leading to a subsequent NULL ptr deref. For very large values of \|i\|, the calculation \|i * 4\| could be a positive value smaller than \|i\|. In this case memory is allocated to the internal BIGNUM data field, but it is insufficiently sized leading to heap corruption. A similar issue exists in BN_dec2bn. This could have security consequences if BN_hex2bn/BN_dec2bn is ever called by user applications with very large untrusted hex/dec data. This is anticipated to be a rare occurrence. All OpenSSL internal usage of these functions use data that is not expected to be untrusted, e.g. config file data or application command line arguments. If user developed applications generate config file data based on untrusted data then it is possible that this could also lead to security consequences. This is also anticipated to be rare.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-vc4y-g9fg-aaak Aliases: CVE-2021-23840 GHSA-qgm6-9472-pwq7 VC-OPENSSL-20210216-CVE-2021-23840	Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).	1.0.2y Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1j Affected by 9 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-vm2m-bf4p-aaaf Aliases: CVE-2019-1559 VC-OPENSSL-20190226-CVE-2019-1559		1.0.2r Affected by 13 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-vwrk-k82e-aaag Aliases: CVE-2015-0208 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0208	Segmentation fault for invalid PSS parameters. The signature verification routines will crash with a NULL pointer dereference if presented with an ASN.1 signature using the RSA PSS algorithm and invalid parameters. Since these routines are used to verify certificate signature algorithms this can be used to crash any certificate verification operation and exploited in a DoS attack. Any application which performs certificate verification is vulnerable including OpenSSL clients and servers which enable client authentication.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-vz46-gfhm-aaap Aliases: CVE-2016-0800 VC-OPENSSL-20160301-CVE-2016-0800	A cross-protocol attack was discovered that could lead to decryption of TLS sessions by using a server supporting SSLv2 and EXPORT cipher suites as a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle. Note that traffic between clients and non-vulnerable servers can be decrypted provided another server supporting SSLv2 and EXPORT ciphers (even with a different protocol such as SMTP, IMAP or POP) shares the RSA keys of the non-vulnerable server. This vulnerability is known as DROWN (CVE-2016-0800). Recovering one session key requires the attacker to perform approximately 2^50 computation, as well as thousands of connections to the affected server. A more efficient variant of the DROWN attack exists against unpatched OpenSSL servers using versions that predate 1.0.2a, 1.0.1m, 1.0.0r and 0.9.8zf released on 19/Mar/2015 (see CVE-2016-0703 below). Users can avoid this issue by disabling the SSLv2 protocol in all their SSL/TLS servers, if they've not done so already. Disabling all SSLv2 ciphers is also sufficient, provided the patches for CVE-2015-3197 (fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.1r and 1.0.2f) have been deployed. Servers that have not disabled the SSLv2 protocol, and are not patched for CVE-2015-3197 are vulnerable to DROWN even if all SSLv2 ciphers are nominally disabled, because malicious clients can force the use of SSLv2 with EXPORT ciphers. OpenSSL 1.0.2g and 1.0.1s deploy the following mitigation against DROWN: SSLv2 is now by default disabled at build-time. Builds that are not configured with "enable-ssl2" will not support SSLv2. Even if "enable-ssl2" is used, users who want to negotiate SSLv2 via the version-flexible SSLv23_method() will need to explicitly call either of: SSL_CTX_clear_options(ctx, SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2); or SSL_clear_options(ssl, SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2); as appropriate. Even if either of those is used, or the application explicitly uses the version-specific SSLv2_method() or its client or server variants, SSLv2 ciphers vulnerable to exhaustive search key recovery have been removed. Specifically, the SSLv2 40-bit EXPORT ciphers, and SSLv2 56-bit DES are no longer available. In addition, weak ciphers in SSLv3 and up are now disabled in default builds of OpenSSL. Builds that are not configured with "enable-weak-ssl-ciphers" will not provide any "EXPORT" or "LOW" strength ciphers.	1.0.2g Affected by 42 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-vzvx-xtm8-aaac Aliases: CVE-2015-1794 VC-OPENSSL-20150811-CVE-2015-1794	If a client receives a ServerKeyExchange for an anonymous DH ciphersuite with the value of p set to 0 then a seg fault can occur leading to a possible denial of service attack.	1.0.2e Affected by 50 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-w17h-u8wd-aaaj Aliases: CVE-2022-2068 VC-OPENSSL-20220621-CVE-2022-2068	In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).	1.0.2zf Affected by 0 other vulnerabilities. 1.1.1p Affected by 1 other vulnerability. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 3.0.4 Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-w299-9hqt-aaan Aliases: CVE-2015-3193 VC-OPENSSL-20151203-CVE-2015-3193	There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites.	1.0.2e Affected by 50 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-w3xz-a1z2-aaaf Aliases: CVE-2017-3731 VC-OPENSSL-20170126-CVE-2017-3731	If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k.	1.0.2k Affected by 23 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0d Affected by 15 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-w8mr-jycm-aaag Aliases: CVE-2016-0701 VC-OPENSSL-20160128-CVE-2016-0701	Historically OpenSSL usually only ever generated DH parameters based on "safe" primes. More recently (in version 1.0.2) support was provided for generating X9.42 style parameter files such as those required for RFC 5114 support. The primes used in such files may not be "safe". Where an application is using DH configured with parameters based on primes that are not "safe" then an attacker could use this fact to find a peer's private DH exponent. This attack requires that the attacker complete multiple handshakes in which the peer uses the same private DH exponent. For example this could be used to discover a TLS server's private DH exponent if it's reusing the private DH exponent or it's using a static DH ciphersuite. OpenSSL provides the option SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE for ephemeral DH (DHE) in TLS. It is not on by default. If the option is not set then the server reuses the same private DH exponent for the life of the server process and would be vulnerable to this attack. It is believed that many popular applications do set this option and would therefore not be at risk. OpenSSL before 1.0.2f will reuse the key if: - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh()/SSL_set_tmp_dh() is used and SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is not set. - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback()/SSL_set_tmp_dh_callback() is used, and both the parameters and the key are set and SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is not used. This is an undocumted feature and parameter files don't contain the key. - Static DH ciphersuites are used. The key is part of the certificate and so it will always reuse it. This is only supported in 1.0.2. It will not reuse the key for DHE ciphers suites if: - SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE is set - SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback()/SSL_set_tmp_dh_callback() is used and the callback does not provide the key, only the parameters. The callback is almost always used like this. Non-safe primes are generated by OpenSSL when using: - genpkey with the dh_rfc5114 option. This will write an X9.42 style file including the prime-order subgroup size "q". This is supported since the 1.0.2 version. Older versions can't read files generated in this way. - dhparam with the -dsaparam option. This has always been documented as requiring the single use. The fix for this issue adds an additional check where a "q" parameter is available (as is the case in X9.42 based parameters). This detects the only known attack, and is the only possible defense for static DH ciphersuites. This could have some performance impact. Additionally the SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE option has been switched on by default and cannot be disabled. This could have some performance impact.	1.0.2f Affected by 48 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-wdvv-5wyx-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2016-2176 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2176	The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data.	1.0.2h Affected by 37 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-xsy7-be4x-aaas Aliases: CVE-2016-2106 VC-OPENSSL-20160503-CVE-2016-2106	Integer overflow in the EVP_EncryptUpdate function in crypto/evp/evp_enc.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of data.	1.0.2h Affected by 37 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-y2q8-1hgf-aaak Aliases: CVE-2019-1551 VC-OPENSSL-20191206-CVE-2019-1551	There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).	1.0.2u Affected by 10 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1e Affected by 12 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-y471-3h22-aaah Aliases: CVE-2016-7055 VC-OPENSSL-20161110-CVE-2016-7055	There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.	1.0.2k Affected by 23 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0c Affected by 18 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-y49b-wcn4-aaaa Aliases: CVE-2015-0288 VC-OPENSSL-20150302-CVE-2015-0288	X509_to_X509_REQ NULL pointer deref. The function X509_to_X509_REQ will crash with a NULL pointer dereference if the certificate key is invalid. This function is rarely used in practice.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ycfx-3rgq-aaah Aliases: CVE-2015-0290 VC-OPENSSL-20150319-CVE-2015-0290	Multiblock corrupted pointer. OpenSSL 1.0.2 introduced the "multiblock" performance improvement. This feature only applies on 64 bit x86 architecture platforms that support AES NI instructions. A defect in the implementation of "multiblock" can cause OpenSSL's internal write buffer to become incorrectly set to NULL when using non-blocking IO. Typically, when the user application is using a socket BIO for writing, this will only result in a failed connection. However if some other BIO is used then it is likely that a segmentation fault will be triggered, thus enabling a potential DoS attack.	1.0.2a Affected by 59 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-yrx6-rcrr-aaap Aliases: CVE-2022-1292 VC-OPENSSL-20220503-CVE-2022-1292	The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).	1.0.2ze Affected by 1 other vulnerability. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.1o Affected by 2 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 3.0.3 Affected by 5 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-ys3w-wua9-aaas Aliases: CVE-2017-3736 VC-OPENSSL-20171102-CVE-2017-3736	There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen.	1.0.2m Affected by 21 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} 1.1.0g Affected by 12 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}
VCID-z6bg-hyhu-aaas Aliases: CVE-2016-2178 VC-OPENSSL-20160607-CVE-2016-2178	The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack.	1.0.2i Affected by 27 other vulnerabilities. This version is affected by these other vulnerabilities: {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }} {{ fixed_by_vuln.vulnerability_id }}

Next non-vulnerable version	1.0.2zc-de
Latest non-vulnerable version	3.0.7
Risk	10.0

Date	Actor	Action	Vulnerability	Source	VulnerableCode Version
2024-01-03T20:01:42.312607+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-y49b-wcn4-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:41.932368+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-75pz-sunt-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:41.562137+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-b72e-m1ek-aaar	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:41.539949+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-cc4a-98u2-aaam	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:41.516336+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-9few-spp9-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:40.883481+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-bsap-s527-aaaj	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:40.509933+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-1pke-t171-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:40.122450+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-vwrk-k82e-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:40.097812+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-914k-6fj2-aaac	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:39.867756+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-m2aa-mh5n-aaae	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:39.845461+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ycfx-3rgq-aaah	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:39.816349+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-s4w8-efdq-aaac	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150319.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:39.511944+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-69ax-cbdq-aaam	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:39.113927+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-arc3-rhts-aaar	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:38.719444+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-tc8g-det5-aaad	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:38.333351+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-gydy-46kx-aaaf	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:37.947317+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-rhab-a2ya-aaae	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:37.614331+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-hzh3-5uc4-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:37.362530+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-3d3c-x2ux-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.924338+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-gp3a-7m39-aaam	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.786120+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-w299-9hqt-aaan	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.744216+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-vzvx-xtm8-aaac	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.696868+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-68v4-qbae-aaak	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160128.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.548774+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-w8mr-jycm-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160128.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.524447+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-1t6y-1zjy-aaae	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:36.151872+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ftte-av19-aaad	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:35.740919+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-t9zu-eqq1-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:35.558705+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-9wtw-93e9-aaam	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:35.394988+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-uh6s-bvxe-aaaf	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:35.228390+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-m4nz-uw2e-aaaq	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:35.056894+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ejg3-awxf-aaan	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.886386+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-vz46-gfhm-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.707173+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-wdvv-5wyx-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.538027+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-egbc-ecck-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.366205+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-xsy7-be4x-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.197384+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-42tc-p92q-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:34.024345+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-cg17-ah7e-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:33.872846+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-52ea-drta-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:33.668215+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-eg7n-8h8z-aaaa	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:33.475356+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-a12s-yyr4-aaad	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:33.283099+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-9fjn-9378-aaae	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:33.091935+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-z6bg-hyhu-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:32.906116+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-kryh-pfgh-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:32.720221+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ue1t-xset-aaah	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:32.535879+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-agz8-77e4-aaaq	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:32.356151+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-581z-anfk-aaaq	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:32.167179+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-sgbg-ntsk-aaac	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.908579+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-bms1-jrax-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.639131+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-y471-3h22-aaah	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20161110.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.458911+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-qbz3-r843-aaaf	https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/08/24/sweet32/	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.384343+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-qkh6-sakf-aaar	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.225018+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-w3xz-a1z2-aaaf	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:31.046173+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-jhg8-wbm2-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170828.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:30.899440+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ys3w-wua9-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171102.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:30.750083+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-4hq6-j84v-aaan	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171207.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:30.288930+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-j8pb-xdpc-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20180416.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:30.127177+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-9cyz-en38-aaad	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20180612.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:29.857572+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-psvb-thr2-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181030.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:29.643347+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ceua-4xhz-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181112.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:29.465794+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-vm2m-bf4p-aaaf	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190226.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:29.237505+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-pzng-q94v-aaah	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190730.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:28.986465+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-q9r2-dz2p-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:28.693550+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-1gxv-1j1x-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20190910.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:28.445458+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-y2q8-1hgf-aaak	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20191206.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:28.223596+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-msmt-6x6r-aaaj	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20200909.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:28.084458+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-nx9u-49dk-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20201208.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:27.856913+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-vc4y-g9fg-aaak	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:27.585495+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-9ruy-372r-aaas	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210216.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:27.246536+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-ghgs-7167-aaag	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:26.906426+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-qtbw-vpbp-aaaj	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220128.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:26.630558+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-6pjh-cgdt-aaaj	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:26.237502+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-yrx6-rcrr-aaap	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt	34.0.0rc1
2024-01-03T20:01:25.928978+00:00	OpenSSL Importer	Affected by	VCID-w17h-u8wd-aaaj	https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt	34.0.0rc1